https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Using-IJL-for-MJPEG/m-p/923162#M15903 <DIV></DIV> <DIV>Hi,</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>I'm looking for the white paper titled "Using the IJL with JPEG Compressed FlashPix Files" as referenced in then ijlman.pdf for an example of extended baseline decoding.</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>I'm trying to implement an MJPEG decoder using the IJL and I can't figure out how to set up IJL for optimal decoding using persistent Huffman tables.</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>Are there any example code out there using IJL for MJPEG?</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>Help <SPAN>appreciated</SPAN>.</DIV> <DIV></DIV> Tue, 14 Dec 2004 23:55:20 GMT gerdin 2004-12-14T23:55:20Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Using-IJL-for-MJPEG/m-p/923162#M15903 <DIV></DIV> <DIV>Hi,</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>I'm looking for the white paper titled "Using the IJL with JPEG Compressed FlashPix Files" as referenced in then ijlman.pdf for an example of extended baseline decoding.</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>I'm trying to implement an MJPEG decoder using the IJL and I can't figure out how to set up IJL for optimal decoding using persistent Huffman tables.</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>Are there any example code out there using IJL for MJPEG?</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>Help <SPAN>appreciated</SPAN>.</DIV> <DIV></DIV> Tue, 14 Dec 2004 23:55:20 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Using-IJL-for-MJPEG/m-p/923162#M15903 gerdin 2004-12-14T23:55:20Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Using-IJL-for-MJPEG/m-p/923163#M15904 <DIV>Hi,</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>actually we do not have MJPEG sample right now, but it should be easy for you to develop such one. As I understand you need just decode onimage by image base. Is it difficult?</DIV> <DIV>Did you look on "w_ipp-sample-jpeg_p_4[1].1.007.zip" samples? You can find here IJL-IPP sample with ijl_fpx.pdf document.</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>But I recommend you to migrate to the new JPEG codec API, which you can see in JPEGView sample in this archive. The reasons for thatare new JPEG codec provides much better performance and we will not continue supporting of IJL API in the future releases.</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>Please also take a look on another thread about IPP JPEG codec</DIV> <DIV><A href="http://softwareforums.intel.com/ids/board/message?board.id=IPP&amp;message.id=1384#M1384" target="_blank">http://softwareforums.intel.com/ids/board/message?board.id=IPP&amp;message.id=1384#M1384</A></DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>Regards,</DIV> <DIV> Vladimir</DIV> Sat, 18 Dec 2004 02:30:25 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Using-IJL-for-MJPEG/m-p/923163#M15904 Vladimir_Dudnik 2004-12-18T02:30:25Z