<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: buffersize in function ippmInvert_ma_32f_S2 in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/buffersize-in-function-ippmInvert-ma-32f-S2/m-p/928046#M16372</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;there is answer from our expert:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="2"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The IPP 4.0 documentation contained the bug which has been fixed since the version IPP 4.1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The actual buffer size is (heightWidth^2+heightWidth).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would like to advise using the last IPP versions for small matrices which provide better performance and reliability. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Note, the latest IPP version is v5.1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 21:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-05-17T21:22:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>buffersize in function ippmInvert_ma_32f_S2</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/buffersize-in-function-ippmInvert-ma-32f-S2/m-p/928045#M16371</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I tried to use the ippmInvert_ma_32f_S2-Function for small matrices. I recognized, that the size of the buffer has to be larger than heightWidth^2. In my case the function works fine, if bufferSize = 1.5 * heightWidth^2 is used. I don't know if its a bug or the error on my side.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm using the IPP 4.0.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks a lot&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;M.W.&lt;P&gt;Message Edited by MWeissbach on &lt;SPAN class="date_text"&gt;05-10-2006&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="time_text"&gt;05:57 AM&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 18:42:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/buffersize-in-function-ippmInvert-ma-32f-S2/m-p/928045#M16371</guid>
      <dc:creator>mweissbach</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-10T18:42:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: buffersize in function ippmInvert_ma_32f_S2</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/buffersize-in-function-ippmInvert-ma-32f-S2/m-p/928046#M16372</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;there is answer from our expert:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="2"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The IPP 4.0 documentation contained the bug which has been fixed since the version IPP 4.1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The actual buffer size is (heightWidth^2+heightWidth).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would like to advise using the last IPP versions for small matrices which provide better performance and reliability. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Note, the latest IPP version is v5.1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 21:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/buffersize-in-function-ippmInvert-ma-32f-S2/m-p/928046#M16372</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-17T21:22:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

