ROI in ippiGetAffineBound and ippiWarpAffine

quidam — Wed, 10 May 2006 17:48:53 GMT

I run into an issue with ROI specification in the above functions. Here's an example to illustrate the problem:

IppiRect srcROI = { 0, 0, 400, 300 };

coeff[0][0] = 0.55333333333333334;

coeff[0][1] = 0.0;

coeff[0][2] = 0.0;

coeff[1][0] = 0.0;

coeff[1][1] = 0.55333333333333334;

coeff[1][2] = 0.0;

double bound[2][2];

ippiGetAffineBound(srcROI, bound, coeff);

Basically, the transformation scales the source by a factor of 0.55333333333333334 along both axis, hence bound should read:

bound[0][0] = 0.0;

bound[0][1] = 0.0;

bound[1][0] = 221.333333333333336;

bound[1][1] = 166.000000000000002;

Instead, I got the following values:

bound[0][0] = 0.0;

bound[0][1] = 0.0;

bound[1][0] = 220.78000000000000;

bound[1][1] = 165.44666666666666.;

Looks like the function is computing based on a source size of { 399, 299 } instead of { 400, 300 }. Is the ROI specification supposed to exclude the end pixels for both axis?

Thanks in advance for any answers.

Re: ROI in ippiGetAffineBound and ippiWarpAffine

Vladimir_Dudnik — Sun, 21 May 2006 05:37:45 GMT

Hello,

there is answer from our expert:

The model of geometrical functions Rotate, Shear, WarpAffine, WarpBilinear, WarpPerspective is the next - the pixel is consider as point not a square socoordinates {0, 0, 399, 299} corresponds to ROI {0, 0, 400, 300}

Regards,
Vladimir

Re: ROI in ippiGetAffineBound and ippiWarpAffine

quidam — Mon, 22 May 2006 10:01:25 GMT

Hi Vladimir,

Thanks for the reply. Appreciate it.

tópico Re: ROI in ippiGetAffineBound and ippiWarpAffine na Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives

ROI in ippiGetAffineBound and ippiWarpAffine

Re: ROI in ippiGetAffineBound and ippiWarpAffine

Re: ROI in ippiGetAffineBound and ippiWarpAffine