<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic G.729 example now modified for RTP and Asterisk, licensing issues in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/G-729-example-now-modified-for-RTP-and-Asterisk-licensing-issues/m-p/937253#M17303</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have modified the G.729 example to demonstrate how you would use the code to:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;a) generate encoded bitstreams in the format for RTP&lt;BR /&gt;b) integrate this code with the Asterisk PBX&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My code is available as a patch at &lt;A href="http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/g729" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/g729&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Would someone at Intel consider integrating this work into the samples in some way?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, can someone from Intel advise on whether I am permitted to distribute the complete modified example in source and binary formats?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Daniel</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2004 20:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous87</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-09-26T20:51:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>G.729 example now modified for RTP and Asterisk, licensing issues</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/G-729-example-now-modified-for-RTP-and-Asterisk-licensing-issues/m-p/937253#M17303</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have modified the G.729 example to demonstrate how you would use the code to:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;a) generate encoded bitstreams in the format for RTP&lt;BR /&gt;b) integrate this code with the Asterisk PBX&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My code is available as a patch at &lt;A href="http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/g729" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/g729&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Would someone at Intel consider integrating this work into the samples in some way?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, can someone from Intel advise on whether I am permitted to distribute the complete modified example in source and binary formats?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Daniel</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2004 20:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/G-729-example-now-modified-for-RTP-and-Asterisk-licensing-issues/m-p/937253#M17303</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous87</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-09-26T20:51:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: G.729 example now modified for RTP and Asterisk, licensing</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/G-729-example-now-modified-for-RTP-and-Asterisk-licensing-issues/m-p/937254#M17304</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi Daniel,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Thank you for the interest to IPP and for sharing your ideas. I will involve the correct people to answer your questions.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; Vladimir&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:09:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/G-729-example-now-modified-for-RTP-and-Asterisk-licensing-issues/m-p/937254#M17304</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-04T18:09:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

