https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippsPolyphaseResample-performance/m-p/937741#M17384 <DIV>Hello,</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>please note, you can attach zip archive to your post on this forum, so if you agree to place some example as an open source you can do it this way.</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>Regards,<BR /> Vladimir</DIV> Mon, 03 Apr 2006 03:23:59 GMT Vladimir_Dudnik 2006-04-03T03:23:59Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippsPolyphaseResample-performance/m-p/937738#M17381 <DIV></DIV><DIV><P>Not long ago I had to implement a resampler with rational resampling factor. Out of curiosity I've done it in two ways - using multirate FIR filters (ippsFIR) and using ippsPolyphaserResample* functions. The thing is that while measuring performance of these implementations I found out that using just multirate FIR filter usually gives much better performance. For example, resampling from 48000 Hz to 44100 Hz with roll-off coeficient 0.9 and alpha and filter taps lengths such that out of band suppression is 60 dB I've got roughly 55 clocks per sample using multirate filter and 210 clocks per sample using ippsPolyphaseResample. Why is it so "slow"?</P><P>Measurements were done on computer with P4-3.2HT. I'm using IPP 5.0 and all operations areperformed in Ipp32f format.</P></DIV><P>Message Edited by KhoroshavinSS on <SPAN class="date_text">03-31-2006</SPAN><SPAN class="time_text">06:43 AM</SPAN></P> Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:39:06 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippsPolyphaseResample-performance/m-p/937738#M17381 khoroshavinss 2006-03-31T22:39:06Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippsPolyphaseResample-performance/m-p/937739#M17382 <DIV></DIV><P>The calculation flow is different in these functions. Multirate filter does upsampling, then filtering, then downsampling. Polyphase resample calculates filters for each phase and calculated each pixel with the proper filter. It has performance hint to do internal calculations in floats or doubles.</P><P>Could you please send your example? It's interesting for us, too.</P><P>Thanks,</P><P>Alexander</P><P></P> Sat, 01 Apr 2006 01:27:33 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippsPolyphaseResample-performance/m-p/937739#M17382 Intel_C_Intel 2006-04-01T01:27:33Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippsPolyphaseResample-performance/m-p/937740#M17383 <DIV>I see. I've used ippAlgHintFast flag in PolyphaseResampleInit function, so if my guess is right it means that calculations were done in floats.</DIV><DIV></DIV><DIV>Concerning the example - no problem, if you tell where exactly to send it.</DIV><DIV></DIV><DIV>Best regards,</DIV><DIV>Sergey</DIV> Sat, 01 Apr 2006 03:56:31 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippsPolyphaseResample-performance/m-p/937740#M17383 khoroshavinss 2006-04-01T03:56:31Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippsPolyphaseResample-performance/m-p/937741#M17384 <DIV>Hello,</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>please note, you can attach zip archive to your post on this forum, so if you agree to place some example as an open source you can do it this way.</DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>Regards,<BR /> Vladimir</DIV> Mon, 03 Apr 2006 03:23:59 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippsPolyphaseResample-performance/m-p/937741#M17384 Vladimir_Dudnik 2006-04-03T03:23:59Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippsPolyphaseResample-performance/m-p/937742#M17385 <DIV></DIV><P>Hello,</P><P>You can send the example to <A href="mailto:alexander.kibkalo@intel.com" target="_blank">alexander.kibkalo@intel.com</A></P><P>Thanks,</P><P>Alexander</P><P></P> Tue, 11 Apr 2006 22:23:11 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippsPolyphaseResample-performance/m-p/937742#M17385 Intel_C_Intel 2006-04-11T22:23:11Z