https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/h-261-support/m-p/958917#M19469 <DIV></DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>Why is h.261 not supported? Any recommendations on what to do if h.261 is needed?</DIV> Thu, 13 May 2004 07:10:38 GMT didehvarf 2004-05-13T07:10:38Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/h-261-support/m-p/958917#M19469 <DIV></DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV>Why is h.261 not supported? Any recommendations on what to do if h.261 is needed?</DIV> Thu, 13 May 2004 07:10:38 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/h-261-support/m-p/958917#M19469 didehvarf 2004-05-13T07:10:38Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/h-261-support/m-p/958918#M19470 <P>Hi,</P> <P>You know, it is impossible to support all the things in world:) So, one of the reasons we consider when we plan new functionality in libraries is how interesting this functionality will be, I mean, how popular it is, how much customers we can expect and so on.</P> <P>However, because IPP is like set of building blocks, you can useit to implement everything you want. For example, I think you can get performance gain from using IPP DCT8x8 functions, motion compensation functions and so on.</P> <P>And of course you can submit your suggestion as feature request. </P> <P>Regards,<BR /> Vladimir</P> <DIV></DIV> Sat, 15 May 2004 00:51:13 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/h-261-support/m-p/958918#M19470 Intel_C_Intel 2004-05-15T00:51:13Z