<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IPPS Compare! in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPPS-Compare/m-p/965778#M20139</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi!&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;The signal processing libraryis missingippsCompare&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;(&amp;lt;, &amp;gt;, =. &amp;gt;=, &amp;lt;=) routines. They can get very handy in&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;some cases. Together with them you would have to&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;provide "gather" and "scater" methods to allow&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;compressing and decompressing sparse data&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;returned from ippsCompare (sparse vector&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;support). For f32 and f64 types. Complex&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;support would be absolutely great. &lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Regards!&lt;BR /&gt;Atmapuri.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:08:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>atmapuri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-03-26T18:08:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPPS Compare!</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPPS-Compare/m-p/965778#M20139</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi!&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;The signal processing libraryis missingippsCompare&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;(&amp;lt;, &amp;gt;, =. &amp;gt;=, &amp;lt;=) routines. They can get very handy in&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;some cases. Together with them you would have to&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;provide "gather" and "scater" methods to allow&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;compressing and decompressing sparse data&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;returned from ippsCompare (sparse vector&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;support). For f32 and f64 types. Complex&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;support would be absolutely great. &lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Regards!&lt;BR /&gt;Atmapuri.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:08:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPPS-Compare/m-p/965778#M20139</guid>
      <dc:creator>atmapuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-26T18:08:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPPS Compare!</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPPS-Compare/m-p/965779#M20140</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Did you see ippsThreshold functions? They can be used to compare vector with some level.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPPS-Compare/m-p/965779#M20140</guid>
      <dc:creator>Intel_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-29T23:34:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPPS Compare!</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPPS-Compare/m-p/965780#M20141</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I noticed Treshold functions, but they are not the same as compare.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Atmapuri&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:30:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPPS-Compare/m-p/965780#M20141</guid>
      <dc:creator>atmapuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-30T14:30:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

