<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Result of alpha composition in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Result-of-alpha-composition/m-p/967584#M20314</link>
    <description>Hello, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm using AlphaComp_8uAC4R function. I want to be able to work in both modes : alpha-premultiplied mode and not premultiplied mode.&lt;BR /&gt;From my tests, it seems that the results of the function with ippAlphaOver are alpha-premultiplied :&lt;BR /&gt;I've the same results with &lt;BR /&gt;AlphaPremul(im1);&lt;BR /&gt;AlphaPremul(im2);&lt;BR /&gt;AlphaComp(im1,im2,ippAlphaOverPremul)&lt;BR /&gt;and &lt;BR /&gt;AlphaComp(im1,im2,ippAlphaOver)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it the expected behaviour ?&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a inverse function for AlphaPremul I could use to transform the result ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Raphael</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:19:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rdebeugny</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-03-10T01:19:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Result of alpha composition</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Result-of-alpha-composition/m-p/967584#M20314</link>
      <description>Hello, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm using AlphaComp_8uAC4R function. I want to be able to work in both modes : alpha-premultiplied mode and not premultiplied mode.&lt;BR /&gt;From my tests, it seems that the results of the function with ippAlphaOver are alpha-premultiplied :&lt;BR /&gt;I've the same results with &lt;BR /&gt;AlphaPremul(im1);&lt;BR /&gt;AlphaPremul(im2);&lt;BR /&gt;AlphaComp(im1,im2,ippAlphaOverPremul)&lt;BR /&gt;and &lt;BR /&gt;AlphaComp(im1,im2,ippAlphaOver)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it the expected behaviour ?&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a inverse function for AlphaPremul I could use to transform the result ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Raphael</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:19:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Result-of-alpha-composition/m-p/967584#M20314</guid>
      <dc:creator>rdebeugny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-10T01:19:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Result of alpha composition</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Result-of-alpha-composition/m-p/967585#M20315</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Dear Customer,&lt;BR /&gt;If you would like further investigation on those Intel IPP functions, please submit an issue with details and test casesthrough Intel Premier Support at &lt;A href="https://premier.intel.com" target="_blank"&gt;https://premier.intel.com&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Ying&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Intel IPP Support&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 05:50:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Result-of-alpha-composition/m-p/967585#M20315</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ying_S_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-16T05:50:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

