<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Strange results of IPP H.264 encoding for subblock split = 1 option in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Strange-results-of-IPP-H-264-encoding-for-subblock-split-1/m-p/968967#M20427</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;I'd like to report some experimental data from H.264 encoding of test sequences: stefan and akiyo. For reference I've used JM10.0 reference software using Simplified FME algorithm. Basically, it seems like enabling subblock split = 1 option in IPP-based H.264 encoder (which is to enable 8x4, 4x8 and 4x4 subblocks for motion estimation)sometimes hurtsperformance of ipp-based h.264 encoder e.g. for stefan sequence (comparing to JM reference software) as follows:&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;h264IPP-stefan-nosplit 34 31.27dB 632.73kbps 9.712sec&lt;BR /&gt;h264IPP-stefan-split 34 31.27dB 638.45kbps 14.922sec&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;by the 1% bitrate increase instead of expected decrease at unchanged SNR level. Normally adding smaller sizes to motion estimation with a properly functioning R-D scheme shouldboth decrease bitrateand increase SNR at the same time. In the case of IPP code that only happens for Akiyo sequence and not for Stefan sequence.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Please comment or maybe that is already fixed in upcoming release?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Best regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;AndrewK&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;PS. For your reference I'm attaching complete experimental results and configuration files of iPP H.264 encoder used in this experiment merged into a single file&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:42:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>andrewk88</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-10-18T22:42:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Strange results of IPP H.264 encoding for subblock split = 1 option</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Strange-results-of-IPP-H-264-encoding-for-subblock-split-1/m-p/968967#M20427</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;I'd like to report some experimental data from H.264 encoding of test sequences: stefan and akiyo. For reference I've used JM10.0 reference software using Simplified FME algorithm. Basically, it seems like enabling subblock split = 1 option in IPP-based H.264 encoder (which is to enable 8x4, 4x8 and 4x4 subblocks for motion estimation)sometimes hurtsperformance of ipp-based h.264 encoder e.g. for stefan sequence (comparing to JM reference software) as follows:&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;h264IPP-stefan-nosplit 34 31.27dB 632.73kbps 9.712sec&lt;BR /&gt;h264IPP-stefan-split 34 31.27dB 638.45kbps 14.922sec&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;by the 1% bitrate increase instead of expected decrease at unchanged SNR level. Normally adding smaller sizes to motion estimation with a properly functioning R-D scheme shouldboth decrease bitrateand increase SNR at the same time. In the case of IPP code that only happens for Akiyo sequence and not for Stefan sequence.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Please comment or maybe that is already fixed in upcoming release?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Best regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;AndrewK&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;PS. For your reference I'm attaching complete experimental results and configuration files of iPP H.264 encoder used in this experiment merged into a single file&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:42:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Strange-results-of-IPP-H-264-encoding-for-subblock-split-1/m-p/968967#M20427</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrewk88</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-18T22:42:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Strange results of IPP H.264 encoding for subblock split =</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Strange-results-of-IPP-H-264-encoding-for-subblock-split-1/m-p/968968#M20428</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dear Customer,&lt;BR /&gt;Please use the latest version of IPP 5.0 gold from&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.intel.com/software/products/ipp" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.intel.com/software/products/ipp&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;and updated sample with 5.0 from &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.intel.com/software/products/ipp/samples.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.intel.com/software/products/ipp/samples.htm&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;to see if the problem still exists in 5.0. The sample you need to use is Media Processing Sample where contains H.264 decoder/encoder componetns. You need to build the video encoder application in order to encoder h.264. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please check the readme for instructions.&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Ying S&lt;BR /&gt;Intel Corp.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 03:14:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Strange-results-of-IPP-H-264-encoding-for-subblock-split-1/m-p/968968#M20428</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ying_S_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-26T03:14:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Strange results of IPP H.264 encoding for subblock split =</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Strange-results-of-IPP-H-264-encoding-for-subblock-split-1/m-p/968969#M20429</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, there is developer's comment:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" size="2"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your detailed information. There is such an effect in the encoder and it will remain also in the IPP v5.0 final release. Such a behaviour can be explained by underestimation of extra MV coding penalty in a choosing best prediction algorithm. We are working on this issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:26:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Strange-results-of-IPP-H-264-encoding-for-subblock-split-1/m-p/968969#M20429</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-27T23:26:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Strange results of IPP H.264 encoding for subblock split =</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Strange-results-of-IPP-H-264-encoding-for-subblock-split-1/m-p/968970#M20430</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Vladimir,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the update.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please let us know when fixed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andrew&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Strange-results-of-IPP-H-264-encoding-for-subblock-split-1/m-p/968970#M20430</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrewk88</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-27T23:31:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Strange results of IPP H.264 encoding for subblock split =</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Strange-results-of-IPP-H-264-encoding-for-subblock-split-1/m-p/968971#M20431</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sure.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But it is better to submitt issue to &lt;A href="http://premier.intel.com" target="_blank"&gt;Intel Premier Support&lt;/A&gt;, so it will be tracked and you will be notified automatically when fix became available.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:37:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Strange-results-of-IPP-H-264-encoding-for-subblock-split-1/m-p/968971#M20431</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-27T23:37:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

