<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic &amp;gt;&amp;gt;...Do IPP functions  handle in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-IPP-functions-handle-data-that-contain-special-values/m-p/969773#M20480</link>
    <description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;...Do IPP functions  handle special values like quiet NaN...
&amp;gt;&amp;gt;...if x is a quiet NaN value, then do functions like ippsAddC_32f(x, yptr, length_of_y) returns strictly all NaNs despite whatever
&amp;gt;&amp;gt;values stored in yptr?

An IPP function could fail with Access Violation exception. It could also process data without Access Violation exception in a future release of IPP and please take a look at a similar thread:

&lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=106039&amp;amp;o=a&amp;amp;s=lr" target="_blank"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=106039&amp;amp;o=a&amp;amp;s=lr&lt;/A&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:08:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SergeyKostrov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-11T06:08:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How IPP functions handle data that contain special values?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-IPP-functions-handle-data-that-contain-special-values/m-p/969771#M20478</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do IPP functions&amp;nbsp; handle special values like quiet&amp;nbsp;NaN/inf &amp;nbsp;strictly following the IEEE 754 way?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:21:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-IPP-functions-handle-data-that-contain-special-values/m-p/969771#M20478</guid>
      <dc:creator>www_q_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-11T05:21:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I mean, such as:</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-IPP-functions-handle-data-that-contain-special-values/m-p/969772#M20479</link>
      <description>I mean, such as: 

if x is a quiet NaN value, then do functions like ippsAddC_32f(x, yptr, length_of_y) returns strictly all NaNs despite whatever values stored in yptr? 

Also how NaN values will be ranked when sorting some array that contain NaNs?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:29:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-IPP-functions-handle-data-that-contain-special-values/m-p/969772#M20479</guid>
      <dc:creator>www_q_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-11T05:29:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&gt;&gt;...Do IPP functions  handle</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-IPP-functions-handle-data-that-contain-special-values/m-p/969773#M20480</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;...Do IPP functions  handle special values like quiet NaN...
&amp;gt;&amp;gt;...if x is a quiet NaN value, then do functions like ippsAddC_32f(x, yptr, length_of_y) returns strictly all NaNs despite whatever
&amp;gt;&amp;gt;values stored in yptr?

An IPP function could fail with Access Violation exception. It could also process data without Access Violation exception in a future release of IPP and please take a look at a similar thread:

&lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=106039&amp;amp;o=a&amp;amp;s=lr" target="_blank"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=106039&amp;amp;o=a&amp;amp;s=lr&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:08:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-IPP-functions-handle-data-that-contain-special-values/m-p/969773#M20480</guid>
      <dc:creator>SergeyKostrov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-11T06:08:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks, so the IPP functions</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-IPP-functions-handle-data-that-contain-special-values/m-p/969774#M20481</link>
      <description>Thanks, so the IPP functions are not stable with special values... thats too bad.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:52:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-IPP-functions-handle-data-that-contain-special-values/m-p/969774#M20481</guid>
      <dc:creator>www_q_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-11T06:52:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&gt;&gt;... the IPP functions are</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-IPP-functions-handle-data-that-contain-special-values/m-p/969775#M20482</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;... the IPP functions are not stable with special values...

...It could also process data without Access Violation exception in a future release... and please take it into account. I wonder if somebody from IPP team could provide an update regarding the problem.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:01:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-IPP-functions-handle-data-that-contain-special-values/m-p/969775#M20482</guid>
      <dc:creator>SergeyKostrov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-11T07:01:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IPP libraries strictly follow</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-IPP-functions-handle-data-that-contain-special-values/m-p/969776#M20483</link>
      <description>IPP libraries strictly follow IEEE 754 for floating point numbers. That means a bug in realization if you find different/undesirable behavior for any IPP function - so be so kind - submit a bug to QuAD or post a message here, please. Regarding ippiRotate - it has been already fixed - use 7.1. version, please. 2 Sergey Kostrov: I don't know any other IPP function that fails with AV because of special FP values in parameters - if you know - be so kind, share this info here, please. 

PS I think you know an anecdote about Japanese gasoline-powered saw...

Regards,
Igor</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:43:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-IPP-functions-handle-data-that-contain-special-values/m-p/969776#M20483</guid>
      <dc:creator>Igor_A_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-12T07:43:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

