topic Re: static libraries question in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives

static libraries question

muse_lin — Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:25:36 GMT

An application that is dynamically linked to the Intel IPP v4.0 libraries has a faster execution time than when statically linked at AMD CPU.

Re: static libraries question

ndepalma — Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:50:56 GMT

Yes I believe so. I believe that IPP is using the MMX chip on the processor to accelerate it's computations. I'm not quite sure how it maps to AMD's 3DNow! but it seems like it doesn't very well, if at all. I have been running on my AMD athlon at home and on my INtel here at work and by far, the intel is much much much faster despite having only a slight frequency difference. I hope this helps.

Re: static libraries question

Vladimir_Dudnik — Sat, 08 Oct 2005 00:41:43 GMT

Hi,

First of all, Intel IPP uses PX code on non-Intel processors, it is the easiest way to avoid any issues with compatibility in instruction set. Second, IPP uses OMP threading in some functions in DLLs and does not use it in static libraries, so on dual-way systems IPP DLLs can be faster than static libraries

You also can be interested to lookonother topics about using IPP on non-Intel processors:

http://softwareforums.intel.com/ids/board/message?board.id=IPP&message.id=85

http://softwareforums.intel.com/ids/board/message?board.id=IPP&message.id=204

http://softwareforums.intel.com/ids/board/message?board.id=IPP&message.id=257

http://softwareforums.intel.com/ids/board/message?board.id=IPP&message.id=459

http://softwareforums.intel.com/ids/board/message?board.id=IPP&message.id=1033

http://softwareforums.intel.com/ids/board/message?board.id=IPP&message.id=2409

http://softwareforums.intel.com/ids/board/message?board.id=IPP&message.id=2695

http://softwareforums.intel.com/ids/board/message?board.id=IPP&message.id=2806

Regards,

Vladimir

Message Edited by vdudnik on 10-07-2005 10:44 AM