<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Image resizing question in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Image-resizing-question/m-p/982594#M21473</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm resizing large images (&amp;gt;10000x10000, rgb or cmyk) using the ippiResize functions.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Am I correct in thinking that the functions require a whole image to be loaded into memory? (not neseccarily a problem as memory is cheap)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, are there some sizes &amp;amp; scaling which work best? eg I know there are optimal ways of scaling to 50%, 33%, does the ippiResize also benefit at these scalings?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've been musing about loading either a few scanlines at a time, or breaking the images into tiles - would a 10x10 set of 1024x1024 image tiles scale faster?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Alistair</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:32:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>abraidwood</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-07-28T15:32:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Image resizing question</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Image-resizing-question/m-p/982594#M21473</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm resizing large images (&amp;gt;10000x10000, rgb or cmyk) using the ippiResize functions.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Am I correct in thinking that the functions require a whole image to be loaded into memory? (not neseccarily a problem as memory is cheap)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, are there some sizes &amp;amp; scaling which work best? eg I know there are optimal ways of scaling to 50%, 33%, does the ippiResize also benefit at these scalings?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've been musing about loading either a few scanlines at a time, or breaking the images into tiles - would a 10x10 set of 1024x1024 image tiles scale faster?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Alistair</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:32:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Image-resizing-question/m-p/982594#M21473</guid>
      <dc:creator>abraidwood</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-07-28T15:32:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Image resizing question</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Image-resizing-question/m-p/982595#M21474</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi Alistair,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;I recommend you to take a look on our sample which demonstrate how to work with tiled images, so you can breakhuge images into tiles and work with tiles. Please, download "w_ipp-sample-image_b_5.0.006.zip" file, you can find in this archive image-tiling sample&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; Vladimir&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:31:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Image-resizing-question/m-p/982595#M21474</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-12T23:31:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

