<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Image Processing and SMP speedup in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Image-Processing-and-SMP-speedup/m-p/987618#M21944</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Will dual processing systems automatically benefit when suing IPP? We're planning on using the image library with various data types for large images (4kx4k). I would expect to see a near linear speedup for simple arithmetic operations, is this the case or do I need to explicitly introduce threading myself?&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2005 08:14:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-06-26T08:14:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Image Processing and SMP speedup</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Image-Processing-and-SMP-speedup/m-p/987618#M21944</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Will dual processing systems automatically benefit when suing IPP? We're planning on using the image library with various data types for large images (4kx4k). I would expect to see a near linear speedup for simple arithmetic operations, is this the case or do I need to explicitly introduce threading myself?&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2005 08:14:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Image-Processing-and-SMP-speedup/m-p/987618#M21944</guid>
      <dc:creator>tez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-26T08:14:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Image Processing and SMP speedup</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Image-Processing-and-SMP-speedup/m-p/987619#M21945</link>
      <description>No, they will not automatically benefit.  Efficient multithreading is too application specific for a performance library to do it for you.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 03:22:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Image-Processing-and-SMP-speedup/m-p/987619#M21945</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdrooks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-07-15T03:22:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Image Processing and SMP speedup</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Image-Processing-and-SMP-speedup/m-p/987620#M21946</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;actually, some of IPP functions use OpenMP threading inside, so you will get automatically some benefits when you are using IPP DLLs. Note, there is no internal threading in IPP static libraries, so you can tune threading in your application by yourself.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; Vladimir&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:31:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Image-Processing-and-SMP-speedup/m-p/987620#M21946</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-07-27T15:31:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

