<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IPP Performance Dual Core P4 vs. Single/Dual Xeon EMT64 in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-Performance-Dual-Core-P4-vs-Single-Dual-Xeon-EMT64/m-p/988125#M22008</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Well for pure performance on the number of actual mpeg4 streams that can be decoded, would you reccomend a dual Xeon 2MB cache system or the Dual Core P4? Which would be able to decode more streams or do the same number of streams more efficiently?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Thanks!&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:10:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>networkcloset</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-06-24T15:10:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPP Performance Dual Core P4 vs. Single/Dual Xeon EMT64</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-Performance-Dual-Core-P4-vs-Single-Dual-Xeon-EMT64/m-p/988123#M22006</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;I was wondering if you could advise on the best platform for IPP performance. We are going to be doing a large amount of mpeg-4 ASP decoding and are looking at either running a machine based on a Dual Core P4 Intel Pentium D (Smithfield) Core, or running adual Xeon EMT64 (Irwindale) Core machine. Can you shed any light on which would provide the best platform for IPP usage?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Thanks!&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:42:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-Performance-Dual-Core-P4-vs-Single-Dual-Xeon-EMT64/m-p/988123#M22006</guid>
      <dc:creator>networkcloset</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-22T12:42:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP Performance Dual Core P4 vs. Single/Dual Xeon EMT64</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-Performance-Dual-Core-P4-vs-Single-Dual-Xeon-EMT64/m-p/988124#M22007</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;P class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;Dear Customer,&lt;NAMESPACE prefix="o" ns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/NAMESPACE&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;
&lt;P class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;If the &lt;NAMESPACE prefix="st1" ns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"&gt;&lt;CITY st="on"&gt;OSs&lt;/CITY&gt; are 32bits,then both Dual Core P4 Intel Pentium D (&lt;CITY st="on"&gt;&lt;PLACE st="on"&gt;Smithfield&lt;/PLACE&gt;&lt;/CITY&gt;) Core anddual Xeon EMT64 (Irwindale) Core machine will use "t7" code from Intel IPPand shoudl run well. As Irwindale is an SMP system thus it should run slightlybetter than &lt;CITY st="on"&gt;&lt;PLACE st="on"&gt;Smithfield&lt;/PLACE&gt;&lt;/CITY&gt;.&lt;/NAMESPACE&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;
&lt;P class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Same thing if&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;the &lt;CITY st="on"&gt;&lt;PLACE st="on"&gt;OSs&lt;/PLACE&gt;&lt;/CITY&gt; are 64bits,but "m7" code from IPP EM64T pacakge will be used. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;Additionally, you shouldnoticesome performance gain for the Intel IPP MPEG-4 decoder on dual core systems as we added additional threading optimizations for this decoder.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;Hope it helps.&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;Ying &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:46:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-Performance-Dual-Core-P4-vs-Single-Dual-Xeon-EMT64/m-p/988124#M22007</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ying_S_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-23T23:46:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP Performance Dual Core P4 vs. Single/Dual Xeon EMT64</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-Performance-Dual-Core-P4-vs-Single-Dual-Xeon-EMT64/m-p/988125#M22008</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Well for pure performance on the number of actual mpeg4 streams that can be decoded, would you reccomend a dual Xeon 2MB cache system or the Dual Core P4? Which would be able to decode more streams or do the same number of streams more efficiently?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Thanks!&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:10:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-Performance-Dual-Core-P4-vs-Single-Dual-Xeon-EMT64/m-p/988125#M22008</guid>
      <dc:creator>networkcloset</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-24T15:10:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP Performance Dual Core P4 vs. Single/Dual Xeon EMT64</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-Performance-Dual-Core-P4-vs-Single-Dual-Xeon-EMT64/m-p/988126#M22009</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think the most visible difference here not in performance but in level of power consumption. DC systems should require less power at the same (or similar) performance level.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:10:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-Performance-Dual-Core-P4-vs-Single-Dual-Xeon-EMT64/m-p/988126#M22009</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T00:10:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP Performance Dual Core P4 vs. Single/Dual Xeon EMT64</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-Performance-Dual-Core-P4-vs-Single-Dual-Xeon-EMT64/m-p/988127#M22010</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   I am trying to run terminal service for 30 users, would you share whether I should use a Dual Core P4 or  Xeon machine ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rgds&lt;BR /&gt;Brian</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:57:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-Performance-Dual-Core-P4-vs-Single-Dual-Xeon-EMT64/m-p/988127#M22010</guid>
      <dc:creator>ngszehung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-10T22:57:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP Performance Dual Core P4 vs. Single/Dual Xeon EMT64</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-Performance-Dual-Core-P4-vs-Single-Dual-Xeon-EMT64/m-p/988128#M22011</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry, I have no idea what workload one terminal session put on to the system. Probably you need to look at server systems for such task rather than on just usual workstations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 20:14:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-Performance-Dual-Core-P4-vs-Single-Dual-Xeon-EMT64/m-p/988128#M22011</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-11T20:14:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

