<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IJL and DirectX in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IJL-and-DirectX/m-p/988523#M22047</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;we never seen such conflicts. Interesting, what is the reason to use old IJL version? As you probably know,we have IJL library available in sources as sample in IPP v4.1. I also should mention that we have no plan to continue support for IJL library in IPP v5.0. Now, we deliver simple JPEG codec as a IPP sample JPEGView. Could you try this codec to see if there still any conflicts?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; Vladimir&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:06:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-07-21T17:06:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IJL and DirectX</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IJL-and-DirectX/m-p/988522#M22046</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hello!&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;I encountered a problem with cooperative use of IJL 1.5 and DirectX 8.1 - 9.0c. If some application using directx video capture is running on computer, IJL have a great loss of performance. For example, my application encodes same 32-bit image with resolution 720x576 30 times per second. Processor usage is 0% on pentium4 2.6 GHz, Windows XP Pro. Then i'm starting AMCAP application from DirectX 8.1 SDK which captures video stream and displaying it, and my encoding IJL-application raises in processor usage to 30-40%. Separate usage of both applications gives 0% of processor time.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;I've never seen such collision. Maybe somebody knows the cause of this conflict?&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 00:02:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IJL-and-DirectX/m-p/988522#M22046</guid>
      <dc:creator>sdenv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-17T00:02:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IJL and DirectX</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IJL-and-DirectX/m-p/988523#M22047</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;we never seen such conflicts. Interesting, what is the reason to use old IJL version? As you probably know,we have IJL library available in sources as sample in IPP v4.1. I also should mention that we have no plan to continue support for IJL library in IPP v5.0. Now, we deliver simple JPEG codec as a IPP sample JPEGView. Could you try this codec to see if there still any conflicts?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; Vladimir&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:06:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IJL-and-DirectX/m-p/988523#M22047</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-07-21T17:06:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

