<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cache usage for a DSP program implemented with IPP in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Cache-usage-for-a-DSP-program-implemented-with-IPP/m-p/990488#M22243</link>
    <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am currently building a real-time multiprocessor scheduling algorithm that will preempt&lt;BR /&gt;tasks and move them between processors frequently. One of our biggest concerns is that&lt;BR /&gt;there will be a serious cache hit whenever a task moves between processors. Our target application&lt;BR /&gt;is a DSP program, and as is my understand such programs typically have a small cache footprint. I was wondering, if we were to move our DSP program over to the IPP, how large would the cache footprint be?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the help,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Aaron</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 01:34:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>block1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-05-25T01:34:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cache usage for a DSP program implemented with IPP</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Cache-usage-for-a-DSP-program-implemented-with-IPP/m-p/990488#M22243</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am currently building a real-time multiprocessor scheduling algorithm that will preempt&lt;BR /&gt;tasks and move them between processors frequently. One of our biggest concerns is that&lt;BR /&gt;there will be a serious cache hit whenever a task moves between processors. Our target application&lt;BR /&gt;is a DSP program, and as is my understand such programs typically have a small cache footprint. I was wondering, if we were to move our DSP program over to the IPP, how large would the cache footprint be?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the help,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Aaron</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 01:34:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Cache-usage-for-a-DSP-program-implemented-with-IPP/m-p/990488#M22243</guid>
      <dc:creator>block1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-25T01:34:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cache usage for a DSP program implemented with IPP</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Cache-usage-for-a-DSP-program-implemented-with-IPP/m-p/990489#M22244</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi Aaron,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;I think it is not related to IPP directly. You can write program which work with memory in efficient way with or without using IPP. Generally speaking, you should reduce each task memory requirement to not allow one taskloadallcache memory.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; Vladimir&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 01:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Cache-usage-for-a-DSP-program-implemented-with-IPP/m-p/990489#M22244</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-25T01:59:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

