<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ippiMalloc* equivalence in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiMalloc-equivalence/m-p/991599#M22382</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  I was wondering if there is any difference between all the different versions of ippiMalloc for a given depth and channel number. For example, is there a difference in the memory allocation (e.g. alignment) between ippiMalloc_8u_C4 and ippiMalloc_8u_AC4, or ippiMalloc_32fc_C3 and ippiMalloc_32fc_P3?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Could I use one instead of the other?&lt;BR /&gt;Would there be any ill effects?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Adi</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 21:34:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>adi_shavit</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-04-28T21:34:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ippiMalloc* equivalence</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiMalloc-equivalence/m-p/991599#M22382</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  I was wondering if there is any difference between all the different versions of ippiMalloc for a given depth and channel number. For example, is there a difference in the memory allocation (e.g. alignment) between ippiMalloc_8u_C4 and ippiMalloc_8u_AC4, or ippiMalloc_32fc_C3 and ippiMalloc_32fc_P3?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Could I use one instead of the other?&lt;BR /&gt;Would there be any ill effects?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Adi</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 21:34:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiMalloc-equivalence/m-p/991599#M22382</guid>
      <dc:creator>adi_shavit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-28T21:34:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ippiMalloc* equivalence</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiMalloc-equivalence/m-p/991600#M22383</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi Adi,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;yes, you can use C4 instead of AC4, they are same same and co-exists just for convinence.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; Vladimir&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:20:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiMalloc-equivalence/m-p/991600#M22383</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-29T00:20:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ippiMalloc* equivalence</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiMalloc-equivalence/m-p/991601#M22384</link>
      <description>..and the same goes for the 3 channel versionx (plane vs. pixel) too, right?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Adi</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 17:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiMalloc-equivalence/m-p/991601#M22384</guid>
      <dc:creator>adi_shavit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-01T17:53:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ippiMalloc* equivalence</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiMalloc-equivalence/m-p/991602#M22385</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;yes, right&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 21:29:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiMalloc-equivalence/m-p/991602#M22385</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-13T21:29:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

