<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IJL vs. IPP in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IJL-vs-IPP/m-p/995927#M22912</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;No answer on this issue ?&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 07:59:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>macom2005</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-02-09T07:59:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IJL vs. IPP</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IJL-vs-IPP/m-p/995926#M22911</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;i am using IJL 2.0 from IPP 4.1 and have good results. The speed of jpeg encode / decode increase about 140% compared to delphi standard. I am thinking about using the IPP Jpeg functions instead of IJL. My questions :&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;- Is it worth to do the work. Can this speed up my program again ?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;- Are there delphi headers available to use this ippi functions ?&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Thx!&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:19:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IJL-vs-IPP/m-p/995926#M22911</guid>
      <dc:creator>macom2005</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-07T19:19:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IJL vs. IPP</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IJL-vs-IPP/m-p/995927#M22912</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;No answer on this issue ?&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 07:59:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IJL-vs-IPP/m-p/995927#M22912</guid>
      <dc:creator>macom2005</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-09T07:59:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IJL vs. IPP</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IJL-vs-IPP/m-p/995928#M22913</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;I'm sorry for delay with answering, just was very busy last days. Of course, we have answer. In general, so-called IPP JPEG codec will be faster than IJL (even based on IPP), because of more efficient implementation. But regarding Delphi support - we do not have plan to provide such support in the nearest release, so if you are interested in it you can:&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;a) submit this feature request through premier.intel.com and we will consider if it fits our resources and plans&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;b) to implement Delphi interface by yourself&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;In any case, I recommend you to take a look on JPEGView sample, which contains new IPP JPEG codec implementation to estimate its performance and functionality. You can download JPEG samples through this link&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.intel.com/software/products/ipp/jpeg.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.intel.com/software/products/ipp/jpeg.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt; Vladimir&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:56:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IJL-vs-IPP/m-p/995928#M22913</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-09T18:56:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

