<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic about ippsCopy_8u in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/about-ippsCopy-8u/m-p/789959#M2322</link>
    <description>You are welcome.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FYI, in IPP test suite we have a special class of tests to check that functions work with not aligned data.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:50:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-03T14:50:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>about ippsCopy_8u</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/about-ippsCopy-8u/m-p/789956#M2319</link>
      <description>Hi all: I'm working with IPP from years but I have a doubt about using ofippsCopy_8u. I hope someone can solve me one for all :)&lt;DIV&gt;If I allocate memory with a standard "malloc" or "new" operator (so without usingippsMalloc): is it safe to useippsCopy_8u on it? or due to memory not aligned the copy could overflow my buffer?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I mean:&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;char* p1=new char[100];&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;char* p2=new char[100];&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;ippsCopy_8u(p1,p2,100); -&amp;gt; is it safe with any size on every allocations?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;furthermore: if I useippsCopy_8u on a memory allocated with "new" or with a memory allocated with "ippsMalloc", can I obtain different performance?&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:32:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/about-ippsCopy-8u/m-p/789956#M2319</guid>
      <dc:creator>selea</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-03T14:32:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>about ippsCopy_8u</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/about-ippsCopy-8u/m-p/789957#M2320</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;it is safe to call IPP functions on not aligned data. Of course you may expect different performance in this case simple because modern processors access data by aligned addressed more efficiently.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:36:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/about-ippsCopy-8u/m-p/789957#M2320</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-03T14:36:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>about ippsCopy_8u</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/about-ippsCopy-8u/m-p/789958#M2321</link>
      <description>ok thank you for solving my long time doubt :)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:39:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/about-ippsCopy-8u/m-p/789958#M2321</guid>
      <dc:creator>selea</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-03T14:39:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>about ippsCopy_8u</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/about-ippsCopy-8u/m-p/789959#M2322</link>
      <description>You are welcome.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FYI, in IPP test suite we have a special class of tests to check that functions work with not aligned data.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:50:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/about-ippsCopy-8u/m-p/789959#M2322</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-03T14:50:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

