<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Yes, you are right, there are in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Apply-Filter-on-Image-Using-quot-In-Place-quot/m-p/1021130#M23533</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you are right, there are no "I" flavors for Row/Column filters. And I can confirm that if you try them with pSrc==pDst you'll see incorrect result. As a workaround for Row filter you can use ippsFIR function in a row-by-row loop.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;regards, Igor.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:01:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Igor_A_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-14T08:01:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Apply Filter on Image Using "In Place"</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Apply-Filter-on-Image-Using-quot-In-Place-quot/m-p/1021125#M23528</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I know that as a policy you removed all the "In Place" function in Intel IPP.&lt;BR /&gt;
	I'm talking about the Image Processing domain functions.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I was wondering though, what would happen if I send the pointer as destination and source?&lt;BR /&gt;
	Should the current function work? Which might fail?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I'm asking specifically on the Column / Row Filter.&lt;BR /&gt;
	Should it work?&lt;BR /&gt;
	Should other work?&lt;BR /&gt;
	Could you publish a list of functions which should perform correctly in this case?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank You.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:55:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Apply-Filter-on-Image-Using-quot-In-Place-quot/m-p/1021125#M23528</guid>
      <dc:creator>Royi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-12T15:55:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royi,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Apply-Filter-on-Image-Using-quot-In-Place-quot/m-p/1021126#M23529</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Royi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Let's add bit clarification on this:&amp;nbsp; we used to plan to remove the "in-place", but based the users feedback, they seems to be used by many users.&amp;nbsp; so we do not have plan to remove the "in-place" functions.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Hope this can be&amp;nbsp;clarified for you.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
	Chao&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;DIV class="forum-post-date"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 01:27:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Apply-Filter-on-Image-Using-quot-In-Place-quot/m-p/1021126#M23529</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-13T01:27:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Chao,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Apply-Filter-on-Image-Using-quot-In-Place-quot/m-p/1021127#M23530</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Chao,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I;m looking at the documentation:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-integrated-performance-primitives-documentation" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-integrated-performance-primitives-documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Specifically at the filtration function at:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/504115" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/504115&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I don't see any "In Place" implementation.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;But anyhow, I'm asking, those functions which are based on FIR filtering, do they support setting the source and the destination pointer to point to the same array?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Should it work work specifically with the separable Row / Column filter?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank You.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:55:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Apply-Filter-on-Image-Using-quot-In-Place-quot/m-p/1021127#M23530</guid>
      <dc:creator>Royi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-13T14:55:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Royi,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Apply-Filter-on-Image-Using-quot-In-Place-quot/m-p/1021128#M23531</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Royi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In-place operation is supported (correctness is guaranteed) only for functions that have suffix "_I" in their names. For all other functions their behavior in case of pSrc==pDst is undefined (some functions can return "unsupported mode" status).&amp;nbsp; Take a look at the IPP Descriptors in the manual &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/503703"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/503703&lt;/A&gt; .&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;regards, Igor&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:28:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Apply-Filter-on-Image-Using-quot-In-Place-quot/m-p/1021128#M23531</guid>
      <dc:creator>Igor_A_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-13T15:28:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Igor,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Apply-Filter-on-Image-Using-quot-In-Place-quot/m-p/1021129#M23532</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Igor,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I see.&lt;BR /&gt;
	And there is no In Place flavor for Column / Row filter, right?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank You.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:12:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Apply-Filter-on-Image-Using-quot-In-Place-quot/m-p/1021129#M23532</guid>
      <dc:creator>Royi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-13T18:12:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, you are right, there are</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Apply-Filter-on-Image-Using-quot-In-Place-quot/m-p/1021130#M23533</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you are right, there are no "I" flavors for Row/Column filters. And I can confirm that if you try them with pSrc==pDst you'll see incorrect result. As a workaround for Row filter you can use ippsFIR function in a row-by-row loop.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;regards, Igor.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:01:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Apply-Filter-on-Image-Using-quot-In-Place-quot/m-p/1021130#M23533</guid>
      <dc:creator>Igor_A_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-14T08:01:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

