<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hendrik,  in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Small-Matrix-Vector-Functions-alternative/m-p/1023386#M23556</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 16.3636360168457px;"&gt;Hendrik,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 16.3636360168457px;"&gt;Have you got the chance to review Intel MKL library? &amp;nbsp;Do you see any gap when moving your code to this library:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/the-alternatives-for-intel-ipp-legacy-small-matrices-domain" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/the-alternatives-for-intel-ipp-legacy-small-matrices-domain&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;BR /&gt;
	Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
	Chao&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:21:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-21T07:21:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Small Matrix/Vector Functions alternative?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Small-Matrix-Vector-Functions-alternative/m-p/1023385#M23555</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I am shocked to find out the small matrices and vector part of the IPP got removed.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In short, what would be an alternative regarding ease of use and performance?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Greetings from Germany,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Hendrik&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:12:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Small-Matrix-Vector-Functions-alternative/m-p/1023385#M23555</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hendrik_S_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-19T11:12:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hendrik, </title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Small-Matrix-Vector-Functions-alternative/m-p/1023386#M23556</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 16.3636360168457px;"&gt;Hendrik,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 16.3636360168457px;"&gt;Have you got the chance to review Intel MKL library? &amp;nbsp;Do you see any gap when moving your code to this library:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/the-alternatives-for-intel-ipp-legacy-small-matrices-domain" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/the-alternatives-for-intel-ipp-legacy-small-matrices-domain&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;BR /&gt;
	Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
	Chao&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:21:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Small-Matrix-Vector-Functions-alternative/m-p/1023386#M23556</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-21T07:21:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Chao,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Small-Matrix-Vector-Functions-alternative/m-p/1023387#M23557</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Chao,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks for that link. It helps alot.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We had a look at the MKL and yes, it provides the functionality. Fortunatly we are starting a fresh project, so no legacy code to adapt.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;But the difference in the interface definition are somewhat hard for me (personally) because I used the ippvm for 5 years. Instead of Matrix x Vectorarray, I have to think of Matrix x Matrix e.g. - but that's not somethink I should be able to adapt quick.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I have a bit more concerns about the performance - but relating to that article, the MKL got / will get better for small matrices.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Hendrik&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Small-Matrix-Vector-Functions-alternative/m-p/1023387#M23557</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hendrik_S_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-22T08:19:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

