<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi Dambrin,Thank you for the in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/WarpAffine-vs-WarpAffineQuad/m-p/1035558#M23748</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Dambrin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the reporting the issue. The functions WarpAffineQuad&amp;nbsp;and WarpPerspectiveQuad do not support the&amp;nbsp;interpolation flag IPPI_INTER_CUBIC2P_CATMULLROM as opposed to the functions WarpAffine&amp;nbsp;and WarpPerspective.&amp;nbsp;If you need the support of new interpolation flags for WarpAffineQuad or WarpPerspectiveQuad functions, you can send the request via Intel Premier Support (IPS).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Valentin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Valentin_K_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-09-01T15:12:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WarpAffine vs WarpAffineQuad</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/WarpAffine-vs-WarpAffineQuad/m-p/1035557#M23747</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would have thought that WarpAffineQuad was branching to WarpAffine, and WarpPerspectiveQuad branching to WarpPerspective, is there a reason that they're not?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;They differ in interpolation flags (both Quad versions are missing flags, but not the same ones). I thought it was an omission in the documentation but no, those flags aren't supported. Is it possible that those functions ARE branching to others, but they have a flag check that hasn't been updated?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The documentation hints that they are branching, but it's not very clear &amp;amp; maybe I'm misinterpreting.&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;EM&gt;The function ippiWarpPerspectiveQuad uses the same formulas for pixel mapping as in the&lt;BR /&gt;
	case of the WarpPerspective function. Transform coefficients are computed internally, based on the mapping&lt;BR /&gt;
	of the source quadrangle to the quadrangle dstQuad specified in the destination image pDst.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 19:07:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/WarpAffine-vs-WarpAffineQuad/m-p/1035557#M23747</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dambrin_D_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-29T19:07:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Dambrin,Thank you for the</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/WarpAffine-vs-WarpAffineQuad/m-p/1035558#M23748</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Dambrin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the reporting the issue. The functions WarpAffineQuad&amp;nbsp;and WarpPerspectiveQuad do not support the&amp;nbsp;interpolation flag IPPI_INTER_CUBIC2P_CATMULLROM as opposed to the functions WarpAffine&amp;nbsp;and WarpPerspective.&amp;nbsp;If you need the support of new interpolation flags for WarpAffineQuad or WarpPerspectiveQuad functions, you can send the request via Intel Premier Support (IPS).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Valentin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/WarpAffine-vs-WarpAffineQuad/m-p/1035558#M23748</guid>
      <dc:creator>Valentin_K_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-01T15:12:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

