<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Resizing with subpixel precision - Ipp32f? in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resizing-with-subpixel-precision-Ipp32f/m-p/1052347#M24040</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If I want to work with Subpixel precision, I read on another post that someone is using Ipp32f types for that purpose.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;But I fail to understand how that can help me.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If I have a Grayscale 16 image, where 1 pixel == 2 bytes, how would I represent the byte array in Ipp32f? And the function ippiResizeLinear_32f_C1R, for example, still takes IppiPoint and IppiSize which contain height and width in integers...&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;What am I missing here?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:40:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John_M_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-06-30T19:40:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Resizing with subpixel precision - Ipp32f?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resizing-with-subpixel-precision-Ipp32f/m-p/1052347#M24040</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If I want to work with Subpixel precision, I read on another post that someone is using Ipp32f types for that purpose.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;But I fail to understand how that can help me.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If I have a Grayscale 16 image, where 1 pixel == 2 bytes, how would I represent the byte array in Ipp32f? And the function ippiResizeLinear_32f_C1R, for example, still takes IppiPoint and IppiSize which contain height and width in integers...&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;What am I missing here?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:40:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resizing-with-subpixel-precision-Ipp32f/m-p/1052347#M24040</guid>
      <dc:creator>John_M_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-30T19:40:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi John,If you need subpixel</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resizing-with-subpixel-precision-Ipp32f/m-p/1052348#M24041</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi John,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you need subpixel precision, you can use the function ippiResizeSqrPixel_16u_C1R. It works with real scale factors and shifts, but this function is deprecated and can be removed in next releases. Alternatively, ippiWarpAffine_16u_C1R can be used for resize processing, because resize operation is&amp;nbsp;the special case of an affine transformation. ippiWarpAffine is slow compared with ippiResizeSqrPixel, we are working on warp functions to reach better performance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards, Valentin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:31:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resizing-with-subpixel-precision-Ipp32f/m-p/1052348#M24041</guid>
      <dc:creator>Valentin_K_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-01T13:31:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thank you Valentin,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resizing-with-subpixel-precision-Ipp32f/m-p/1052349#M24042</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Valentin,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;So, eventually when ippiResizeSqlPixel is dropped, ippiWarpAffine will be the ideal substitute for it?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:23:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resizing-with-subpixel-precision-Ipp32f/m-p/1052349#M24042</guid>
      <dc:creator>John_M_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-02T13:23:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I consider that warp affine</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resizing-with-subpixel-precision-Ipp32f/m-p/1052350#M24043</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I consider that warp affine functions will be the most suitable for a resize transformation with subpixel precision, if ippiResizeSqlPixel is dropped.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Valentin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 10:36:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resizing-with-subpixel-precision-Ipp32f/m-p/1052350#M24043</guid>
      <dc:creator>Valentin_K_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-07T10:36:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

