topic Hey Genady, Thanks for your in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives

ipp9 much slower than ipp8?

alon_b_ — Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:33:10 GMT

Hey, I've updated my code (and compiler) to the 2016 studio, it seems to run a lot slower, after using vtune I see that the ipp functions are much slower, for example, where ippiMean took 0.020s it now takes 0.132s, making my program run a LOT slower, am I doing something wrong? is this known?

I have the following sample

alon_b_ — Tue, 29 Dec 2015 15:33:00 GMT

I have the following sample code:

#include <iostream>
#include "ippi.h"
#include "ippcore.h"
using namespace std;
IppStatus mean( void ) {
Ipp64f mean;
Ipp8u x[5*4];
IppiSize roi = {5,4};
ippiSet_8u_C1R( 3, x, 5, roi );
return ippiMean_8u_C1R( x, 5, roi, &mean );
}
void func_normdiff_l1()
{
Ipp8u pSrc1[8*4];
Ipp8u pSrc2[8*4];
Ipp64f Value;
int src1Step = 8;
int src2Step = 8;
IppiSize roi = {8,4};
IppiSize roiSize = {5,4};

ippiSet_8u_C1R(1, pSrc1, src1Step, roi);
ippiSet_8u_C1R(2, pSrc2, src2Step, roi);

ippiNormDiff_L1_8u_C1R( pSrc1, src1Step, pSrc2, src2Step, roiSize, &Value);
}

int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
ippInit();
for (int i = 0 ; i < 1000000 ; ++i) {
mean();
func_normdiff_l1();
}
}

compiling and running with:

icpc -o main main.cpp -lippi && time ./main

with 2013:

real   0m0.281s
user   0m0.280s
sys   0m0.000s

with 2016:

real   0m0.574s
user   0m0.569s
sys   0m0.005s

I would love to understand why 2016 is so much slower...

Thanks!

the problem size is very tiny

Gennady_F_Intel — Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:43:06 GMT

the problem size is very tiny in your case and using Vtune for make such measurement is not correct. if you want to make direct performance measurement you may try to call ippGetCpuClocks before and after ippiMean_*.*. but I would recommend you or to use IPP perfsys tool to compare the performance on your system, with current version of IPP

Hey Genady, Thanks for your

alon_b_ — Sun, 03 Jan 2016 09:19:22 GMT

Hey Genady, Thanks for your response.

I have ipp running on very big samples, and I noticed the slowdown there, I've added this example to show a simple reproducable code that ipp9 runs halfs as fast, (500mili is a lot, I doubt it's in the error area).

worth noting we've also tested to see which architecture ipp8 & 9 took and they both correctly selected the same.

Ok, thanks for the update. I

Gennady_F_Intel — Sun, 03 Jan 2016 19:13:36 GMT

Ok, thanks for the update. I have two more questions: 1) What is the CPU type you are working on? you may add the code below to check what specific branch of IPP has been called.

void libinfo(void) {
         const IppLibraryVersion* lib = ippiGetLibVersion();
         printf(“%s %s %d.%d.%d.%d\n”, lib->Name, lib->Version,
            lib->major, lib->minor, lib->majorBuild, lib->build);
      }

and 2) what is the "I have ipp running on very big sample" size?

thanks, Gennady

we reproduced the problem on

Gennady_F_Intel — Wed, 13 Jan 2016 06:31:35 GMT

we reproduced the problem on our side - the issue is caused in mul_32fc function. We are planing to fix it the next update of IPP.