<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi Georgy, in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Alternative-for-ippiSSIM-32f-C1R/m-p/1068783#M24481</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Georgy,&lt;BR /&gt;
	One option is using the functions from Intel IPP legacy library,&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-ipp-legacy-libraries"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-ipp-legacy-libraries&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
	By checking the formula with the ippiSSIM_32f_C1R.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;It is just&amp;nbsp;combining several Image Arithmetic functions.&amp;nbsp; so a better way may just use&amp;nbsp;several IPP Image arithmetic to replace the functions, and it can take advantage of the latest optimization.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
	Chao&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 06:13:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-06T06:13:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Alternative for ippiSSIM_32f_C1R</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Alternative-for-ippiSSIM-32f-C1R/m-p/1068782#M24480</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P data-select-like-a-boss="1"&gt;Function&amp;nbsp;ippiSSIM_32f_C1R and others was excluded from the latest versions of IPP without any supposed alternative. Can you tell, why it was performed, what can be used instead?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:33:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Alternative-for-ippiSSIM-32f-C1R/m-p/1068782#M24480</guid>
      <dc:creator>Georgy_O_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-28T18:33:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Georgy,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Alternative-for-ippiSSIM-32f-C1R/m-p/1068783#M24481</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Georgy,&lt;BR /&gt;
	One option is using the functions from Intel IPP legacy library,&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-ipp-legacy-libraries"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-ipp-legacy-libraries&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
	By checking the formula with the ippiSSIM_32f_C1R.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;It is just&amp;nbsp;combining several Image Arithmetic functions.&amp;nbsp; so a better way may just use&amp;nbsp;several IPP Image arithmetic to replace the functions, and it can take advantage of the latest optimization.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
	Chao&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 06:13:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Alternative-for-ippiSSIM-32f-C1R/m-p/1068783#M24481</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-06T06:13:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

