<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I am using IPP 9.0 Update 3, in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ComputeThreshold-Otsu-Bug-when-applied-to-already-binary-images/m-p/1073515#M24594</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using IPP 9.0 Update 3, which is also where I first noticed the effect.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 07:17:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Daniel_G_7</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-08-24T07:17:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ComputeThreshold_Otsu Bug(?) when applied to already binary images</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ComputeThreshold-Otsu-Bug-when-applied-to-already-binary-images/m-p/1073513#M24592</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I discovered that when you apply ippiComputeThreshold_Otsu_8u_C1R to an 8 bit gray image that only contains 0 and 255 (i.e., is already binarized), the resulting Otsu threshold is t = 0.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;From my reading of the documentation, I expected that the "lower" of the two Otsu classes would be all values strictly less than the resulting threshold, i.e. the threshold could have been any value between 1 and 255. The value zero results in a uniformly white image after thresholding regardless of the input.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:58:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ComputeThreshold-Otsu-Bug-when-applied-to-already-binary-images/m-p/1073513#M24592</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_G_7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-27T10:58:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Daniel,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ComputeThreshold-Otsu-Bug-when-applied-to-already-binary-images/m-p/1073514#M24593</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Daniel,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reports. Which version of IPP are you using?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I seems be able to reproduce the problem and investigate further.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Ying&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 06:07:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ComputeThreshold-Otsu-Bug-when-applied-to-already-binary-images/m-p/1073514#M24593</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ying_H_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-24T06:07:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I am using IPP 9.0 Update 3,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ComputeThreshold-Otsu-Bug-when-applied-to-already-binary-images/m-p/1073515#M24594</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using IPP 9.0 Update 3, which is also where I first noticed the effect.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 07:17:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ComputeThreshold-Otsu-Bug-when-applied-to-already-binary-images/m-p/1073515#M24594</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_G_7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-24T07:17:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Daniel,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ComputeThreshold-Otsu-Bug-when-applied-to-already-binary-images/m-p/1073516#M24595</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Daniel,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; I get reply from our developer.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The result should be expected.&amp;nbsp; Because according to&amp;nbsp;the original article (this link also exists in the manual) - &lt;A href="http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=4310076"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=4310076" target="_blank"&gt;http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=4310076&lt;/A&gt; . This function calculates a histogram of an image roi and tries to find a valley: “In an ideal case, the histogram has a deep and sharp valley between two peaks representing objects and background, respectively, so that the threshold can be chosen &lt;STRONG&gt;at the bottom of this valley&lt;/STRONG&gt;”. In his particular case the histogram looks like N1,0,0,0,0,….,N2 (where N1 reflects a number of zero elements, N2 – a number of 0xFF elements), - N1 index is the bottom of the valley between N1 and N2 peaks, so corresponding Otsu threshold value is 0.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Ying&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:57:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ComputeThreshold-Otsu-Bug-when-applied-to-already-binary-images/m-p/1073516#M24595</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ying_H_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-25T02:57:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

