<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic c++ std::nth_element-like sorting in IPP? in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/c-std-nth-element-like-sorting-in-IPP/m-p/1073726#M24596</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Does IPP contain a method for computing 'partially sorted' data? In particular, I'm looking for something comparable to the std::nth_element method in C++ that guarantees that data elements less than the element value at n reside at indices less than n, and those that are greater than the value at n reside at indices greater than n, but with no sorting guaranteed for indices i&amp;lt;n guaranteed (and, of course, none for i&amp;gt;n). Thanks in advance for your help.&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:15:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Duane_R_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-04T14:15:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>c++ std::nth_element-like sorting in IPP?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/c-std-nth-element-like-sorting-in-IPP/m-p/1073726#M24596</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does IPP contain a method for computing 'partially sorted' data? In particular, I'm looking for something comparable to the std::nth_element method in C++ that guarantees that data elements less than the element value at n reside at indices less than n, and those that are greater than the value at n reside at indices greater than n, but with no sorting guaranteed for indices i&amp;lt;n guaranteed (and, of course, none for i&amp;gt;n). Thanks in advance for your help.&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:15:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/c-std-nth-element-like-sorting-in-IPP/m-p/1073726#M24596</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_R_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-04T14:15:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi, </title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/c-std-nth-element-like-sorting-in-IPP/m-p/1073727#M24597</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks for checking this. &amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;Intel IPP does not include this function now. &amp;nbsp;I may track it in our feature request database, so it can be reviewed when we plan the future release. &amp;nbsp; Where will such function be helpful?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;BR /&gt;
	Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
	Chao&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 02:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/c-std-nth-element-like-sorting-in-IPP/m-p/1073727#M24597</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-08T02:16:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In the sequential setting</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/c-std-nth-element-like-sorting-in-IPP/m-p/1073728#M24598</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the sequential setting finding the nth_element takes linear time, whereas sorting takes N log N time, so maybe a parallel nth_element is also faster than a parallel sort.&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 13:56:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/c-std-nth-element-like-sorting-in-IPP/m-p/1073728#M24598</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andreas_Fabri__Geome</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-18T13:56:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

