<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi, in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippMalloc-ippsMalloc-alignment-size/m-p/1089669#M24936</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Any answer to this question yet?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:42:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>thomtek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-11T21:42:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ippMalloc/ippsMalloc alignment size</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippMalloc-ippsMalloc-alignment-size/m-p/1089667#M24934</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;According to the IPP user manual, ippMalloc() and ippsMalloc_xxx() provide buffers&amp;nbsp;aligned to&amp;nbsp;64-byte boundaries.&amp;nbsp; But an IPP&amp;nbsp;web page says they align to 32-byte boundaries:&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-tools-for-software-developers-memory-function-faq"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-tools-for-software-developers-memory-function-faq&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We are going to use _aligned_malloc() for large buffer memory allocation and want to set the alignment paramter to give the same&amp;nbsp;alignment as IPP does.&amp;nbsp; Should we use 32-byte or 64-byte alignment?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:53:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippMalloc-ippsMalloc-alignment-size/m-p/1089667#M24934</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomtek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-26T17:53:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Thomas,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippMalloc-ippsMalloc-alignment-size/m-p/1089668#M24935</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Tom,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;I will look into this.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;Best,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Bjoern&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:57:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippMalloc-ippsMalloc-alignment-size/m-p/1089668#M24935</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bjoern_B_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-01T08:57:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippMalloc-ippsMalloc-alignment-size/m-p/1089669#M24936</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Any answer to this question yet?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:42:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippMalloc-ippsMalloc-alignment-size/m-p/1089669#M24936</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomtek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T21:42:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Tom,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippMalloc-ippsMalloc-alignment-size/m-p/1089670#M24937</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Tom,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;You are right, the documentation is inconsistent here. The article on the IPP web page is quite some years old while we changed the alignment to 64-byte. This is true for all kinds of ippMalloc functions as we also need to support AVX with 512-bit vectors which by nature has to be 64-byte aligned. We will change and update the ippMalloc article on the IPP web page accordingly.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;So please use 64-byte alignment in your application to be aligned with the ippMalloc functions.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks for reporting the issue so we can fixed the documentation.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Bjoern&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 14:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippMalloc-ippsMalloc-alignment-size/m-p/1089670#M24937</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bjoern_B_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-12T14:24:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Remark: Article Intel® IPP</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippMalloc-ippsMalloc-alignment-size/m-p/1089671#M24938</link>
      <description>&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"&gt;Remark: Article &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-tools-for-software-developers-memory-function-faq"&gt;&lt;FONT face="Calibri" size="3"&gt;Intel® IPP Memory Function ippMalloc/Free FAQ&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"&gt; got updated. This request will get closed.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"&gt;Bjoern&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 16:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippMalloc-ippsMalloc-alignment-size/m-p/1089671#M24938</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bjoern_B_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-12T16:19:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

