<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Double precision wavelet transform in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Double-precision-wavelet-transform/m-p/1139015#M26044</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd like to know if it was possible to use the wavelet transform in double precision (64bits).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bouchan__Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-23T16:06:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Double precision wavelet transform</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Double-precision-wavelet-transform/m-p/1139015#M26044</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd like to know if it was possible to use the wavelet transform in double precision (64bits).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Double-precision-wavelet-transform/m-p/1139015#M26044</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bouchan__Thomas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-23T16:06:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Double-precision-wavelet-transform/m-p/1139016#M26045</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your question. Wavelet transform function support&amp;nbsp;16s, 32f and 64. You can refer this document for more detail information.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/ipps_0.pdf&amp;nbsp;" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/ipps_0.pdf&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alice&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 07:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Double-precision-wavelet-transform/m-p/1139016#M26045</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alice_H_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-24T07:49:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello, </title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Double-precision-wavelet-transform/m-p/1139017#M26046</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry my question was not very precise, I was talking about a 2D wavelet transform, for images.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the documentation it is only mentioned 32bits but I wonder what would happen if my inputs are of double precision.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:09:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Double-precision-wavelet-transform/m-p/1139017#M26046</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bouchan__Thomas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-24T08:09:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Thomas,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Double-precision-wavelet-transform/m-p/1139018#M26047</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Thomas,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right. for 2D wavelet transform, it only supports 32f so far. I will file it as feature request for future review.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alice&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:25:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Double-precision-wavelet-transform/m-p/1139018#M26047</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alice_H_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-24T08:25:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks! That would be really</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Double-precision-wavelet-transform/m-p/1139019#M26048</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks! That would be really useful indeed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 09:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Double-precision-wavelet-transform/m-p/1139019#M26048</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bouchan__Thomas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-01T09:15:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>here is the link to the intel</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Double-precision-wavelet-transform/m-p/1139020#M26049</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;here is the link to the intel online service center -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;https://sfederation.intel.com/affwebservices/public/saml2sso?SPID=https://saml.salesforce.com.isvc.portal2&amp;amp;ProtocolBinding=urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:bindings:HTTP-POST&amp;amp;RelayState=%2Fservicecenter%3Flang%3Den-US&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 04:28:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Double-precision-wavelet-transform/m-p/1139020#M26049</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-11T04:28:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

