<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Wavelet transforms in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wavelet-transforms/m-p/1139442#M26054</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I looked at ippiWTFwd and ippiWTInvInit for wavelet transforms. However, the IPP implementation has a number of disadvantages:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. ippiWTFwd and ippiWTInvInit are&amp;nbsp;not internally threaded (I assume)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. the border type can not be specified, they are ROI-type everything-must-be-in memory functions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. there are&amp;nbsp;32f_C1R and 32f_C3R variants only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That made the decision easy to write these functions myself, internally threaded for speed. Result attached for a&amp;nbsp;Haar wavelet applied to an 8-bit one-channel standard test-image.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" src="http://adriaan.biz/ipp/lena512-Haar.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While writing the Discrete Wavelet Transform (forward and inverse) I missed ippi functions to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. up-sample an image (insert zero values at odd-indexed pixels of rows or columns)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. down-sample an image (keep the even-indexed pixels of rows or columns)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Up- and downsampling are much-used base-functions &amp;nbsp;when working with pyramid-like structures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adriaan van Os&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:18:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Adriaan_van_Os</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-03-10T17:18:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wavelet transforms</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wavelet-transforms/m-p/1139442#M26054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I looked at ippiWTFwd and ippiWTInvInit for wavelet transforms. However, the IPP implementation has a number of disadvantages:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. ippiWTFwd and ippiWTInvInit are&amp;nbsp;not internally threaded (I assume)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. the border type can not be specified, they are ROI-type everything-must-be-in memory functions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. there are&amp;nbsp;32f_C1R and 32f_C3R variants only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That made the decision easy to write these functions myself, internally threaded for speed. Result attached for a&amp;nbsp;Haar wavelet applied to an 8-bit one-channel standard test-image.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" src="http://adriaan.biz/ipp/lena512-Haar.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While writing the Discrete Wavelet Transform (forward and inverse) I missed ippi functions to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. up-sample an image (insert zero values at odd-indexed pixels of rows or columns)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. down-sample an image (keep the even-indexed pixels of rows or columns)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Up- and downsampling are much-used base-functions &amp;nbsp;when working with pyramid-like structures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adriaan van Os&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:18:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wavelet-transforms/m-p/1139442#M26054</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adriaan_van_Os</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-10T17:18:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Adriaan van Os,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wavelet-transforms/m-p/1139443#M26055</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;Adriaan van Os,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for studying IPP function so deeply. We always put the user experience first, if there are more users want the missed functions,&amp;nbsp;we will&amp;nbsp;put them in our develop plan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BRs,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ruqiu&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 12:18:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wavelet-transforms/m-p/1139443#M26055</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ruqiu_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-09T12:18:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wavelet transforms</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wavelet-transforms/m-p/1280462#M27677</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We will no longer respond to this thread.&amp;nbsp;If you require additional assistance from Intel, please start a new thread. Or you can raise a new feature request through Intel online service center&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supporttickets.intel.com/servicecenter?lang=en-US" target="_blank"&gt;https://supporttickets.intel.com/servicecenter?lang=en-US&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any further interaction in this thread will be considered community only.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 07:09:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wavelet-transforms/m-p/1280462#M27677</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ruqiu_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-11T07:09:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

