<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hello Adriaan van Os, in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiQualityIndex-returning-NaN/m-p/1141554#M26105</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;Adriaan van Os,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't understand what do you mean return a&amp;nbsp;NaN for parameter&amp;nbsp;pQualityIndex.&amp;nbsp;The range of values for the index Q is [-1, 1]. The best value 1 is achieved if and only if the images are&amp;nbsp;identical.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BRs,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ruqiu&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 05:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruqiu_C_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-04-09T05:58:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ippiQualityIndex returning NaN</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiQualityIndex-returning-NaN/m-p/1141553#M26104</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I noticed that&amp;nbsp;ippiQualityIndex may return a NaN for parameter&amp;nbsp;pQualityIndex, even with comparing images that don't contain a NaN themselves. The result code is&amp;nbsp;ippStsNoErr. &amp;nbsp;I guess the cause is division by zero.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suggest to return 0.0 rather than NaN in concerning cases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adriaan van Os&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2020 09:19:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiQualityIndex-returning-NaN/m-p/1141553#M26104</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adriaan_van_Os</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-14T09:19:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Adriaan van Os,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiQualityIndex-returning-NaN/m-p/1141554#M26105</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;Adriaan van Os,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't understand what do you mean return a&amp;nbsp;NaN for parameter&amp;nbsp;pQualityIndex.&amp;nbsp;The range of values for the index Q is [-1, 1]. The best value 1 is achieved if and only if the images are&amp;nbsp;identical.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BRs,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ruqiu&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 05:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiQualityIndex-returning-NaN/m-p/1141554#M26105</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ruqiu_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-09T05:58:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ruqiu,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiQualityIndex-returning-NaN/m-p/1141555#M26106</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ruqiu,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope you understand what a NaN is and how they occur in software. If not, please&amp;nbsp;read the IEEE-754 standard. As I already noted, the cause of the NaN is probably that the software is dividing by zero internally. But it could&amp;nbsp;be something else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To reproduce, I can provide two images for which&amp;nbsp;ippiQualityIndex returns a NaN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adriaan van Os&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 11:53:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiQualityIndex-returning-NaN/m-p/1141555#M26106</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adriaan_van_Os</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-09T11:53:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ippiQualityIndex returning NaN</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiQualityIndex-returning-NaN/m-p/1280455#M27676</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Adriaan van Os，&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for your explanation. And so sorry didn't back to your question for a long time because our website changed from Forum to Community.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Anyway, have you tested with our latest IPP version (2021.2)? If still have any question with our latest version, how about sending us your simple reproducer if you don't mind? Then it will help us investigate the issue.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ruqiu&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 06:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiQualityIndex-returning-NaN/m-p/1280455#M27676</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ruqiu_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-11T06:59:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ippiQualityIndex returning NaN</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiQualityIndex-returning-NaN/m-p/1284095#M27696</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="sub_section_element_selectors"&gt;We are&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="sub_section_element_selectors"&gt;closing the thread now and will no longer respond to this thread.&amp;nbsp;If you require additional assistance from Intel, please start a new thread.&amp;nbsp;Any further interaction in this thread will be considered community only. Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 13:56:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiQualityIndex-returning-NaN/m-p/1284095#M27696</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ruqiu_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-24T13:56:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

