<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi ! in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Safety-of-LZ4-codec-in-IPP/m-p/1144389#M26176</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cal confirm this. LZ4 decoder&amp;nbsp;controls&amp;nbsp;boundaries of source and destination&amp;nbsp;buffers. The decoder will not step beyond limits of source/destination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have any concerns about this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 11:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sergey_K_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-01T11:42:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Safety of LZ4 codec in IPP</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Safety-of-LZ4-codec-in-IPP/m-p/1144388#M26175</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi. &amp;nbsp;I am very pleased to see a considerable boost in performance of the&amp;nbsp;LZ4 codec in IPP. &amp;nbsp;However, I am a bit perplex to not find a safe version for&amp;nbsp;the LZ4 decoding&amp;nbsp;functions,&amp;nbsp;although there are certainly safe versions for encoding, as can be seen at:&amp;nbsp;https://software.intel.com/en-us/ipp-dev-reference-lz4-compression-functions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My assumption is that the decoding functions are safe by default. &amp;nbsp;Can you confirm?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 12:23:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Safety-of-LZ4-codec-in-IPP/m-p/1144388#M26175</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesc_Alted</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-31T12:23:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi !</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Safety-of-LZ4-codec-in-IPP/m-p/1144389#M26176</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cal confirm this. LZ4 decoder&amp;nbsp;controls&amp;nbsp;boundaries of source and destination&amp;nbsp;buffers. The decoder will not step beyond limits of source/destination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have any concerns about this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 11:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Safety-of-LZ4-codec-in-IPP/m-p/1144389#M26176</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergey_K_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-01T11:42:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Right.  So if the decoder</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Safety-of-LZ4-codec-in-IPP/m-p/1144390#M26177</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Right. &amp;nbsp;So&amp;nbsp;if the decoder cannot step beyond the limits of destination buffer&amp;nbsp;then all my concerns are gone :)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 11:52:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Safety-of-LZ4-codec-in-IPP/m-p/1144390#M26177</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesc_Alted</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-01T11:52:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

