<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic How to use the ippcp library correctly in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-to-use-the-ippcp-library-correctly/m-p/1150948#M26292</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have used the ippcp library to check out the performance of SM3 and SM4, and &lt;SPAN style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, &amp;quot;Microsoft YaHei&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;\\5FAE软雅黑&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;\\5B8B体&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Malgun Gothic&amp;quot;, Meiryo, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; line-height: 21px;"&gt;compared them with the lasted openssl version. The result is that the ippcp library did not&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;perform&amp;nbsp;much better than openssl. I compiled my test code with ippcp by using gcc, and I install IPP and IPPCP by default way. My CPU is i5-7400. So, did I use that in correct way? By the way, I found that the ippcp2017 perfrom better than ippcp2019. Waiting for your replay.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 06:59:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>zhu__xuewu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-31T06:59:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to use the ippcp library correctly</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-to-use-the-ippcp-library-correctly/m-p/1150948#M26292</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have used the ippcp library to check out the performance of SM3 and SM4, and &lt;SPAN style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, &amp;quot;Microsoft YaHei&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;\\5FAE软雅黑&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;\\5B8B体&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Malgun Gothic&amp;quot;, Meiryo, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; line-height: 21px;"&gt;compared them with the lasted openssl version. The result is that the ippcp library did not&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;perform&amp;nbsp;much better than openssl. I compiled my test code with ippcp by using gcc, and I install IPP and IPPCP by default way. My CPU is i5-7400. So, did I use that in correct way? By the way, I found that the ippcp2017 perfrom better than ippcp2019. Waiting for your replay.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 06:59:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/How-to-use-the-ippcp-library-correctly/m-p/1150948#M26292</guid>
      <dc:creator>zhu__xuewu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-31T06:59:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

