<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thanks for the issue, we in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-2019-Update-1-DFT-Length-Limit/m-p/1168234#M26840</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the issue, we definitely will update IPPs documentation and existing KB article you referred to as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2019 03:29:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-16T03:29:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPP 2019 Update 1 DFT Length Limit?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-2019-Update-1-DFT-Length-Limit/m-p/1168230#M26836</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Using IPP 2019 Update 1, I get a&amp;nbsp;ippStsSizeErr error whenever I call either of the following functions with a length that's greater than 2^26 (67,108,864).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ippsDFTGetSize_C_64fc()&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ippsDFTInit_C_64fc()&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This length limit isn't documented anywhere. Is it expected behavior?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This article indicates that the length limit for the DFT is 2^32:&amp;nbsp;https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/mkl-ipp-choosing-an-fft&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:54:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-2019-Update-1-DFT-Length-Limit/m-p/1168230#M26836</guid>
      <dc:creator>Beer__Austin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T17:54:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for report. This looks</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-2019-Update-1-DFT-Length-Limit/m-p/1168231#M26837</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for report. This looks like a error, we will check.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 04:07:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-2019-Update-1-DFT-Length-Limit/m-p/1168231#M26837</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-14T04:07:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-2019-Update-1-DFT-Length-Limit/m-p/1168232#M26838</link>
      <description>&lt;P style="margin-left:0cm; margin-right:0cm"&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="margin-left:0cm; margin-right:0cm"&gt;The size variables pSizeSpec, pSizeInit, pSizeBuf in function ippsDFTGetSize have int datatype, therefore only vectors which require auxiliary size less than INT_MAX(32bit) can be processed, i.e.:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;for double precision complex DFT (64fc) the length upper bound is 67108863 (2^26 - 1).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;for single precision complex DFT (32fc) the length upper bound is 134217727 (2^27 - 1).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P style="margin-left:0cm; margin-right:0cm"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;for double precision complex FFT (64fc) the length upper bound is 2^27.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;for double precision complex FFT (32fc) the length upper bound is 2^28.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P style="margin-left:0cm; margin-right:0cm"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="margin-left:0cm; margin-right:0cm"&gt;You can use DFT from MKL for your task because they support ILP64 for size variables.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 16:12:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-2019-Update-1-DFT-Length-Limit/m-p/1168232#M26838</guid>
      <dc:creator>ArtemMaklaev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-15T16:12:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thank you very much for that</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-2019-Update-1-DFT-Length-Limit/m-p/1168233#M26839</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for that&amp;nbsp;information. It makes sense. I think it might be helpful to others if this information were officially documented in the IPP Developer Reference as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 16:28:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-2019-Update-1-DFT-Length-Limit/m-p/1168233#M26839</guid>
      <dc:creator>Beer__Austin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-15T16:28:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for the issue, we</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-2019-Update-1-DFT-Length-Limit/m-p/1168234#M26840</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the issue, we definitely will update IPPs documentation and existing KB article you referred to as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2019 03:29:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-2019-Update-1-DFT-Length-Limit/m-p/1168234#M26840</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-16T03:29:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

