<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi Rishu, in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Security-Failures-in-IPP-compilers-and-libraries-2017-2-187/m-p/1174170#M27025</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rishu,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I personally believe it would be fine for you usage cause it is not Intel product issue. I am afraid there's no user guide/article for Intel Parallel Studio required 100% pass with BinScope tests. &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px;"&gt;The BinScope is developed by Microsoft and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;we do not much clear how BinScope judge if binary remains potential vulnerabilites. And it is also not very clear how these BinScope considered "vulnerabilites" can affect your usage.&amp;nbsp;If you meet product bug or get incorrect result by using Intel product, it would be our issue. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
	Fiona&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 02:56:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zhen_Z_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-08-29T02:56:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Security Failures in IPP- compilers_and_libraries_2017.2.187</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Security-Failures-in-IPP-compilers-and-libraries-2017-2-187/m-p/1174169#M27024</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Intel,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We have tried running Binscope Security Tests on Intel IPP on Windows&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;C:\Program Files (x86)\IntelSWTools\compilers_and_libraries_2017.2.187\windows&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Test Command:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em;"&gt;BinScope.exe /x /c GSCheck /target "C:\Program Files (x86)\IntelSWTools\compilers_and_libraries_2017.2.187\windows" &amp;nbsp;/save "C:\Program Files (x86)\IntelSWTools\compilers_and_libraries_2017.2.187\windows\output.html" /o "C:\Program Files (x86)\IntelSWTools\compilers_and_libraries_2017.2.187\windows\output.xml"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em;"&gt;Please see The attached output.txt attached.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:49:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Security-Failures-in-IPP-compilers-and-libraries-2017-2-187/m-p/1174169#M27024</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rishu_A_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T08:49:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Rishu,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Security-Failures-in-IPP-compilers-and-libraries-2017-2-187/m-p/1174170#M27025</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rishu,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I personally believe it would be fine for you usage cause it is not Intel product issue. I am afraid there's no user guide/article for Intel Parallel Studio required 100% pass with BinScope tests. &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px;"&gt;The BinScope is developed by Microsoft and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;we do not much clear how BinScope judge if binary remains potential vulnerabilites. And it is also not very clear how these BinScope considered "vulnerabilites" can affect your usage.&amp;nbsp;If you meet product bug or get incorrect result by using Intel product, it would be our issue. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
	Fiona&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 02:56:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Security-Failures-in-IPP-compilers-and-libraries-2017-2-187/m-p/1174170#M27025</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zhen_Z_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-29T02:56:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

