<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Request for Large Array Support (64-bit) in IPP APIs Without _L Extension in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Request-for-Large-Array-Support-64-bit-in-IPP-APIs-Without-L/m-p/1753464#M29234</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Kruthika_R,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the report. The request for _L variants of `ippsSub_32s_ISfs` and `ippsMul_32s_ISfs` has been logged. The team will review these for inclusion in a future release based on demand and resource availability.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regarding Priority Support: eligibility and access need a support license. I add a support ticket there, and when you have your full list of requested APIs, feel free to post them there.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Chao&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 07:56:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-07-09T07:56:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Request for Large Array Support (64-bit) in IPP APIs Without _L Extension</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Request-for-Large-Array-Support-64-bit-in-IPP-APIs-Without-L/m-p/1751603#M29230</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Intel Community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am currently working with Intel IPP for optimized performance in large-scale medical imaging applications,&amp;nbsp;some functions have a 64-bit version (with _L suffix), while others do not.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel IPP provides large-array variants of many functions with the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;_L&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;suffix (e.g.,&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;ippiConvValid_32f_L,&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;ippsConv_32f_L). However, several commonly-used functions do&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;not have 64-bit equivalents&lt;/STRONG&gt;, including:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ippsSub_32s_ISfs&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ippsMul_32s_ISfs etc&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Request:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We would greatly appreciate if Intel could extend large-array support (_L&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;variants) to these functions to enable seamless processing of larger datasets without workarounds or custom implementations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apart from the two APIs mentioned earlier, we require support for a few additional APIs as well. We plan to compile a list and submit a formal request. However, before proceeding, I would like to understand the process for raising a priority support request.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Specifically, can any employee from an organization that uses Intel products raise such a request, or does it need to be initiated by specific teams or authorized contacts within the organization?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have already registered on the Intel Registration Center – User Portal. However, when I log in to the customer support portal and try to request IPP support, I receive a message stating that I am not eligible for priority support notifications.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please help clarify this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.intel.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/69556"&gt;@support&lt;/a&gt; for 64 bit platform aware versions in IPP APIs - Intel Community&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Request-for-Large-Array-Support-64-bit-in-IPP-APIs-Without-L/m-p/1751603#M29230</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kruthika_R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-17T04:29:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Request for Large Array Support (64-bit) in IPP APIs Without _L Extension</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Request-for-Large-Array-Support-64-bit-in-IPP-APIs-Without-L/m-p/1753464#M29234</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Kruthika_R,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the report. The request for _L variants of `ippsSub_32s_ISfs` and `ippsMul_32s_ISfs` has been logged. The team will review these for inclusion in a future release based on demand and resource availability.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regarding Priority Support: eligibility and access need a support license. I add a support ticket there, and when you have your full list of requested APIs, feel free to post them there.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Chao&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 07:56:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Request-for-Large-Array-Support-64-bit-in-IPP-APIs-Without-L/m-p/1753464#M29234</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-09T07:56:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

