<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Threaded ColorTwist/ColorTwist32f in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Threaded-ColorTwist-ColorTwist32f/m-p/800887#M3213</link>
    <description>I wonder why those functions are not threaded and if there're some plans for the near futureto implement multithreaded support for them (like for the next update or so)?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They perform very straight pixel-to-pixel calculations so there's not any difficulty to doso...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We need it to make a color compensation for a live video stream, so any FPS drop is absolutely unwelcome.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:07:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kdiamond</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-22T16:07:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Threaded ColorTwist/ColorTwist32f</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Threaded-ColorTwist-ColorTwist32f/m-p/800887#M3213</link>
      <description>I wonder why those functions are not threaded and if there're some plans for the near futureto implement multithreaded support for them (like for the next update or so)?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They perform very straight pixel-to-pixel calculations so there's not any difficulty to doso...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We need it to make a color compensation for a live video stream, so any FPS drop is absolutely unwelcome.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:07:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Threaded-ColorTwist-ColorTwist32f/m-p/800887#M3213</guid>
      <dc:creator>kdiamond</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-22T16:07:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Threaded ColorTwist/ColorTwist32f</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Threaded-ColorTwist-ColorTwist32f/m-p/800888#M3214</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;you are right, it is pretty easy to do parallel processing for straight pixel-to-pixel operations. But you may want to consider implementing this threading on top of IPP function. There is an obvious pros for that approach - you will havefull control on threading of this operation and you will decide whatthreading API to use for implementation.&lt;BR /&gt;We do not plan to increase number of functions which are threaded at primitive level.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:17:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Threaded-ColorTwist-ColorTwist32f/m-p/800888#M3214</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-22T16:17:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

