<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic UMC H.264 decoder in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-H-264-decoder/m-p/802406#M3365</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Purvin, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would it be possible to attach the test stream? Our expert comments that this is not very clear on what is happeing from the description.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Chao &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 05:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-12T05:01:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>UMC H.264 decoder</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-H-264-decoder/m-p/802404#M3363</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;Hi&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;I have a H.264 bitstream (fields only) with intra refresh (no I/IDR only P fields) + recovery point SEI. The bitstream does not start at frame_num = 0. It starts at frame_num = 201, now after the frame_num wraps and the next time a frame with frame_num = 201 arrive the old frame_num = 201 is still in the Decoded list. Not sure why it is not removed.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;This bitstream can be decoded by JM and other decoders. Is there a known issue when a bitstream does not begin with frame_num = 0, has recovery point SEI?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;-Purvin&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:09:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-H-264-decoder/m-p/802404#M3363</guid>
      <dc:creator>Purvin_Pandit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-09T15:09:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UMC H.264 decoder</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-H-264-decoder/m-p/802405#M3364</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;Digging a little more I found this code in:&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;bool TaskSupplier::AddSlice(H264MemoryPiece * pMem, MediaData * pSource)&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;if (NumShortTermRefs + NumLongTermRefs == 0)&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;{&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;....&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;.....&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;	if (sliceHeader-&amp;gt;field_pic_flag)&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;	 {&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;      pFrame-&amp;gt;setPicOrderCnt(m_PicOrderCnt,0);&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;      pFrame-&amp;gt;setPicOrderCnt(m_PicOrderCnt,1);&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;    }&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;   else&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;    {&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;      pFrame-&amp;gt;setPicOrderCnt(m_TopFieldPOC, 0);&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;      pFrame-&amp;gt;setPicOrderCnt(m_BottomFieldPOC, 1);&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;    }&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;}&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Looks like this is done only for the 1st field (in my case) so it sets the top &amp;amp; bottom POC to be the same. This is causing the problem where the bottom field is never removed. This looks like a bug. Can someone confirm?&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:39:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-H-264-decoder/m-p/802405#M3364</guid>
      <dc:creator>Purvin_Pandit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-09T18:39:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UMC H.264 decoder</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-H-264-decoder/m-p/802406#M3365</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Purvin, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would it be possible to attach the test stream? Our expert comments that this is not very clear on what is happeing from the description.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Chao &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 05:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-H-264-decoder/m-p/802406#M3365</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-12T05:01:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UMC H.264 decoder</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-H-264-decoder/m-p/802407#M3366</link>
      <description>Thanks Chao. I will try to get a bitstream to you as soon as I can.&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;-Purvin&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:07:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-H-264-decoder/m-p/802407#M3366</guid>
      <dc:creator>Purvin_Pandit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-14T13:07:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

