<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IPP 7.0 Update2 samples change in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-7-0-Update2-samples-change/m-p/808030#M3735</link>
    <description>That's great, thanks. I actually noticed that the VS plug-in was making a smart decision as to which version of the IPP run-time to link against. This is a very nice feature which is easy to miss.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Peter&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:38:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pvonkaenel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-04T18:38:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPP 7.0 Update2 samples change</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-7-0-Update2-samples-change/m-p/808028#M3733</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I just noticed that the IPP audio-video-codecs samples are now dynamically linking with the MS run-time (/MD where it use to be /MT). Is this a new requirement? I've been using the libraries statically linked against the run-time so before trying to merge the samples into my code, I'd like to make sure there is no problem with static linking.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Peter&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:37:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-7-0-Update2-samples-change/m-p/808028#M3733</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvonkaenel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-04T14:37:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IPP 7.0 Update2 samples change</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-7-0-Update2-samples-change/m-p/808029#M3734</link>
      <description>Hello Peter,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is not a requirement. You can link against the Microsoft static or dynamic runtimes, independently of how you link against the IPP library files (i.e., you can mix the link modes). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This can be a little confusing if you are using the Visual Studio GUI to enable IPP. In this case the/MD and /MT options will be used to decide if the IPP libraries should also be linked statically or dynamically. This is a broad assumption made by the Visual Studio GUI-based configurationtool -- you don't have to do it this way-- but the tool assumes that if you link the Microsoft libraries using /MD you also want to link dynamically with the IPP libraries, etc. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There is nothing in the IPP libraries that requires that link dynamically with the Microsoft runtime libraries.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope that's clear as mud!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Paul</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:24:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-7-0-Update2-samples-change/m-p/808029#M3734</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaulF_IntelCorp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-04T18:24:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IPP 7.0 Update2 samples change</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-7-0-Update2-samples-change/m-p/808030#M3735</link>
      <description>That's great, thanks. I actually noticed that the VS plug-in was making a smart decision as to which version of the IPP run-time to link against. This is a very nice feature which is easy to miss.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Peter&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:38:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-7-0-Update2-samples-change/m-p/808030#M3735</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvonkaenel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-04T18:38:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

