<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IppsMean 1 in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IppsMean-1/m-p/769905#M592</link>
    <description>Hi Y&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks but I suppose that will arise others conflicts problems with same name functions with ipp 7.0 version&lt;BR /&gt;I think that not good way was to removeippsMeanColum&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regard &lt;BR /&gt;Cartu</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:58:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>carlo-turri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-09T20:58:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IppsMean 1</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IppsMean-1/m-p/769902#M589</link>
      <description>Thank toVladimir&lt;BR /&gt; as I seethe IppsMean solve only a row vector average , what about for column average ?&lt;BR /&gt;For my experience example wherein the useof the FFT's magnetude average the ippsMeanColumn&lt;BR /&gt;isvery powerful what can replace it?&lt;BR /&gt;Thank&lt;BR /&gt;Cartu&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IppsMean-1/m-p/769902#M589</guid>
      <dc:creator>carlo-turri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-08T13:31:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IppsMean 1</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IppsMean-1/m-p/769903#M590</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As mentioned in &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=79295&amp;amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;another thread&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;, IPPSR functionsis not part of latest release. It means ippsMeanColumn is available with only Version 6.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;ippsmean&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; function computes the mean (average) of the vector &lt;EM&gt;pSrc&lt;/EM&gt;, and stores the result in &lt;EM&gt;pMean&lt;/EM&gt;. The mean of &lt;EM&gt;pSrc&lt;/EM&gt; is defined by the formula:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.intel.com/skins/images/7B13F55A7CE623EF42E69096FA81A3A1/2021_redesign/images/image_not_found.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should be for row and columns as well???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry, can you explain more on your question isvery powerful what can replace it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Naveen Gv&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 05:55:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IppsMean-1/m-p/769903#M590</guid>
      <dc:creator>Naveen_G_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-09T05:55:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IppsMean 1</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IppsMean-1/m-p/769904#M591</link>
      <description>Hi Cartu, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You may try copyippsr.h ippsr*.libof IPP 6.1 to IPP 7.0 and use the ippsMeanColum as inIPP 6.1.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Itlooks not agood way, but mayworkable in common case.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Ying H.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:00:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IppsMean-1/m-p/769904#M591</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ying_H_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-09T08:00:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IppsMean 1</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IppsMean-1/m-p/769905#M592</link>
      <description>Hi Y&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks but I suppose that will arise others conflicts problems with same name functions with ipp 7.0 version&lt;BR /&gt;I think that not good way was to removeippsMeanColum&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regard &lt;BR /&gt;Cartu</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:58:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IppsMean-1/m-p/769905#M592</guid>
      <dc:creator>carlo-turri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-09T20:58:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IppsMean 1</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IppsMean-1/m-p/769906#M593</link>
      <description>Hi Cartu,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Or you may try ippiMean_32f with specially defined image size (roiSize)in order to proceed 1 column (width=1, height=column height).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;IppStatus ippiMean_32f_C1R(const Ipp32f* pSrc, int srcStep, IppiSize roiSize,&lt;BR /&gt;Ipp64f* pMean, IppHintAlgorithm hint);&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But wemay need to call multiple times to get all columnmean.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;By the way, it seemsno obvious conflict ifto use IPP ippsr*.lib from IPP 6.1 and other ipp library from 7.0 &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Ying</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:33:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IppsMean-1/m-p/769906#M593</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ying_H_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-15T02:33:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

