<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Bug in UMC::ME in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Bug-in-UMC-ME/m-p/836177#M5955</link>
    <description>&lt;BR /&gt;Hi, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;IPP 7.0 update is expected to include the fix for the problem. The release is ready to downlad. Thanks for your report. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Chao &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-08T02:51:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bug in UMC::ME</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Bug-in-UMC-ME/m-p/836175#M5953</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think we have spotted an issue in the file umc_me.cpp function MeBase::EstimateMbInterFast() with sample version 6.1 and 7.01&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Line 2662&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;if(m_cur.BestCost&lt;M_PREDCALC-&gt;GetT2())&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Should be&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;if(BestCost&lt;M_PREDCALC-&gt;GetT2())&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Emmanuel&lt;/M_PREDCALC-&gt;&lt;/M_PREDCALC-&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:40:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Bug-in-UMC-ME/m-p/836175#M5953</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emmanuel_W_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-19T16:40:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bug in UMC::ME</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Bug-in-UMC-ME/m-p/836176#M5954</link>
      <description>Hi Emmanuel,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks for raising this, will let our engineers look through this code to determine if it is really a bug.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:44:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Bug-in-UMC-ME/m-p/836176#M5954</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-20T13:44:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bug in UMC::ME</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Bug-in-UMC-ME/m-p/836177#M5955</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;Hi, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;IPP 7.0 update is expected to include the fix for the problem. The release is ready to downlad. Thanks for your report. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Chao &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Bug-in-UMC-ME/m-p/836177#M5955</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-08T02:51:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

