<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic could AMR122 and EFR be exchanged? in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/could-AMR122-and-EFR-be-exchanged/m-p/837017#M6015</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everybody,&lt;BR /&gt; I have a question about EFR codec. According to the ESTI stander EFR is equal to AMR122, dose it means that I can use the result of AMR122 as the exactly the EFR? Especially, are the bits packing of EFR and AMR122 in the RTP applicationexactly the same?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BR&lt;BR /&gt;Sam&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:24:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>samsmile</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-20T07:24:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>could AMR122 and EFR be exchanged?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/could-AMR122-and-EFR-be-exchanged/m-p/837017#M6015</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everybody,&lt;BR /&gt; I have a question about EFR codec. According to the ESTI stander EFR is equal to AMR122, dose it means that I can use the result of AMR122 as the exactly the EFR? Especially, are the bits packing of EFR and AMR122 in the RTP applicationexactly the same?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BR&lt;BR /&gt;Sam&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:24:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/could-AMR122-and-EFR-be-exchanged/m-p/837017#M6015</guid>
      <dc:creator>samsmile</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-20T07:24:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

