<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Purify reports unitialized memory read in ippGetCpuFeatures in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Purify-reports-unitialized-memory-read-in-ippGetCpuFeatures/m-p/855204#M7014</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;we aware of this Purify behaviour on this function. It is false positive.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:52:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-10-06T16:52:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Purify reports unitialized memory read in ippGetCpuFeatures</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Purify-reports-unitialized-memory-read-in-ippGetCpuFeatures/m-p/855203#M7013</link>
      <description>When I call ippStatic Init in my application running under Purify, it reports an unitialized memory read in ippGetCpuFeatures. Is this a false positive or something to be concerned about?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is with IPP 6.1 Update 1. The CPU is: Intel Core 2 Duo CPU T7300 @ 2.00GHz&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here's what Purify says:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;UMR: Uninitialized memory read in ippGetCpuFeatures {16 occurrences}&lt;BR /&gt; Reading 4 bytes from 0x2043cbc0 (4 bytes at 0x2043cbc0 uninitialized)&lt;BR /&gt; Address 0x2043cbc0 points into a thread's stack &lt;BR /&gt; Address 0x2043cbc0 is 16 bytes below the frame pointer in ippGetCpuFeatures&lt;BR /&gt; Thread ID: 0x1500&lt;BR /&gt; Error location&lt;BR /&gt; ippGetCpuFeatures [.\.\ippcpufeatures.obj]&lt;BR /&gt; ippStaticInit  [(my application's calling function)]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:21:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Purify-reports-unitialized-memory-read-in-ippGetCpuFeatures/m-p/855203#M7013</guid>
      <dc:creator>gauss256</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-04T22:21:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Purify reports unitialized memory read in ippGetCpuFeatures</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Purify-reports-unitialized-memory-read-in-ippGetCpuFeatures/m-p/855204#M7014</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;we aware of this Purify behaviour on this function. It is false positive.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:52:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Purify-reports-unitialized-memory-read-in-ippGetCpuFeatures/m-p/855204#M7014</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-06T16:52:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Purify reports unitialized memory read in ippGetCpuFeatures</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Purify-reports-unitialized-memory-read-in-ippGetCpuFeatures/m-p/855205#M7015</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="margin-top: 5px; width: 100%;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/336498"&gt;Vladimir Dudnik (Intel)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;we aware of this Purify behaviour on this function. It is false positive.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;I see the same behavior in valgrind. It is disturbing to have to write a suppression for this. I'd vote for it to be fixed -- it certainly isn't performance critical.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:42:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Purify-reports-unitialized-memory-read-in-ippGetCpuFeatures/m-p/855205#M7015</guid>
      <dc:creator>mwrighton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-14T22:42:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

