topic Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions [SOLVED/BUG]

mpfeuti — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:49:16 GMT

Hi,

I just started learing IPP. Now, I'm stuck because the ippiCrossCorrFull_NormLevel_32f_C1R function returns strage results.

I have the following test code:

-----------------------------------------------
Ipp32f pSrc[5*4] = { 0, 0, 0, 1, 0,
0, 0, 0, 1, 0,
0, 0, 0, 1, 0,
0, 0, 0, 1, 0};

Ipp32f pTpl[3*4] = { 0, 1, 0,
0, 1, 0,
0, 1, 0,
0, 1, 0};

// according to the manaul the result is 5+3-1 times 4+4-1
IppiSize dstSize = {7,7};
Ipp32f pDst[7*7];
IppiSize srcRoiSize = {5, 4};
IppiSize tplRoiSize = {3, 4};
int srcStep = 5*sizeof(Ipp32f);
int tplStep = 3*sizeof(Ipp32f);
int dstStep = 7*sizeof(Ipp32f);

IppStatus st = ippiCrossCorrFull_NormLevel_32f_C1R(pSrc, srcStep, srcRoiSize,
pTpl, tplStep, tplRoiSize,
pDst, dstStep);
printf("%s\\n", ippGetStatusString(st));

for(int y = 0; y {
for(int x = 0; x {
printf("%f ", pDst[x+y*dstSize.width]);
}
printf("\\n");
}
---------------------------------------------

the result is the following:

##########################
ippStsNoErr: No error, it's OK
0.153093 0.000000 0.000000 -0.213201 0.426401 -0.213201 0.000000
0.306186 0.000000 0.000000 -0.316228 0.632456 -0.316228 0.000000
0.000000 -0.306186 -0.153093 -0.408248 0.816496 -0.408248 -0.153093
0.612372 0.000000 0.000000 -0.500000 1.000000 -0.500000 0.000000
0.000000 -0.306186 -0.153093 -0.408248 0.816496 -0.408248 -0.153093
0.306186 0.000000 0.000000 -0.316228 0.632456 -0.316228 0.000000
0.000000 0.076547 0.000000 -0.213201 0.426401 -0.213201 0.000000
###########################

the result according to MATLAB should be:

**********************************
0 0 0 -0.2132 0.4264 -0.2132 0
0 0 0 -0.3162 0.6325 -0.3162 0
0 0 0 -0.4082 0.8165 -0.4082 0
0 0 0 -0.5000 1.0000 -0.5000 0
0 0 0 -0.4082 0.8165 -0.4082 0
0 0 0 -0.3162 0.6325 -0.3162 0
0 0 0 -0.2132 0.4264 -0.2132 0
**********************************

what's puzzling me is why are in the first 3 and the last column no all entries 0. The 3 remaining columns hold the correct numbers.

The result from MATLAB is what I was expecting. I'm wondering IPP produces non-zero entries. Is this a bug or am I using the IPP function wrongl?

The samples from the manual work as expected. The results match what MATLAB computes.

fyi: I'm running an 64bit Arch Linux with an Intel i5 750 CPU and IPP 6.1.2.051

greetings and happy easter

michael

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

levicki — Mon, 05 Apr 2010 02:01:49 GMT

Michael,

You are missing an important step:

Ipp32f pDst[7*7];

memset(pDst, 0, 7 * 7 * sizeof(Ipp32f));

In other words, you are using uninitialized array, but your results are identical to Matlab otherwise.

Happy coding :)

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

Chao_Y_Intel — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:31:44 GMT

Hello Michael,

Thanks for letting us know. The function ower check about this funcions. The problem came from inaccuracy of calculations in 32f data type. We are planing to include the fix in the upcoming IPP 7.0 beta release.

btw, the function does not need to initialize pDst,

Thanks,

Chao

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

mpfeuti — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 06:15:25 GMT

Thanks for the reply.

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

mpfeuti — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 06:40:14 GMT

Hi,

you mentioned that this should be fixed with the beta release on ipp7. i was wondering how the schedule for the releases of ipp 7 is?

Furthermore, I'm wondering where the rounding issue comes from. I'd like to fully crosscorrelate two images of sizes > 500x500. I heard that the ipp crosscorrelation function may utilize FFT. So my question is, is the rounding issue coming from the FFT? If not then I'm gonna implement my own crosscorrelation.

Many thanks

michael

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

Ciro_R_ — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:27:54 GMT

Hello,

I don't see this fix inhttp://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-ipp-70-library-bug-fixes/

Will it be included in the first non beta 7.0 release?

Thank you

Ciro

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

Chao_Y_Intel — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:12:49 GMT

Ciro,

This was fixed in the Beta package. You can go to Beta registration page to download the IPP 7.0 beta package.

Thanks,

Chao

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

harihar_n — Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:01:57 GMT

Hello,

I am seeing an issue with cross correlation computation in IPP 7.0 update 5. The function is ippiCrossCorrValid_NormLevel_32f_C1R. However my results are not bounded. That is I am sometimes getting results like 22.07, 59.49 etc while the results should be less than 1. I did try initializing the destination pointer, but the problem still remains.

The image patches I am correlating are attached. In this particular case, the maximum correlation I am getting is 22.07.

Is this a known bug ? Any workarounds ?

Thanks!
H

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

SergeyKostrov — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:51:43 GMT

Quoting Igor Levicki

...
You are missing an important step:

Ipp32f pDst[7*7];

memset(pDst, 0, 7 * 7 * sizeof(Ipp32f));
...

I confirm that it doesn't help.

Now, I'd like to understand a couple of more things. It is just confirmed thatthis is a bug.

But, how is it possible?

Because the function ippiCrossCorrFull_NormLevel_32f_C1R is almost 10 year old! I just tested the
Test-Case with IPP v3.0 andhere is my output:

0.0000000149011612 0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 -0.2132006883621216 0.4264013767242432 -0.2132006883621216 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000298023224 0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 -0.3162277638912201 0.6324555277824402 -0.3162277638912201 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000 -0.0000000298023224 -0.0000000149011612 -0.4082482457160950 0.8164964318275452 -0.4082482457160950 -0.0000000149011612
0.0000000596046448 0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 -0.5000000000000000 1.0000000000000000 -0.5000000000000000 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000 -0.0000000298023224 -0.0000000149011612 -0.4082482457160950 0.8164964318275452 -0.4082482457160950 -0.0000000149011612
0.0000000298023224 0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 -0.3162277638912201 0.6324555277824402 -0.3162277638912201 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000 0.0000000074505806 0.0000000000000000 -0.2132006883621216 0.4264013767242432 -0.2132006883621216 0.0000000000000000

Best regards,
Sergey

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

Chao_Y_Intel — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 02:57:16 GMT

Hi Sergey,

When I read the IPP v3.0 data, it looks fine. For single precision data, it only has 23 bit from the fragment: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-precision_floating-point_format

Typically, it can reach about 1e-7. So the following data is fine the single precision.
0.0000000149011612

But the problem reported in the original post does not look good. It create incorrect data:
0.153093

Thanks,
Chao

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

SergeyKostrov — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:09:38 GMT

Hi Chao,

Take a look at all non-zero values in a "leftzero-region". Even if non-zero values do not exceed IPP's epsilon
there is astrange relation between them. Here is a1st column, for example:

0.0000000149011612 - let's saythis is A
0.0000000298023224 - A * 2
0.0000000000000000
0.0000000596046448 - A * 4
0.0000000000000000
0.0000000298023224 - A * 2
0.0000000000000000

IPP's epsilon for a single-precision value isdefined as follows:

...
#define IPP_EPS_32F 1.192092890e-07f
...

Best regards,
Sergey

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

Chao_Y_Intel — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 03:33:01 GMT

Hello Sergey,

For the relation of 1st column, most likely they were caused by the difference of the last bit. If these data is in binary format:

0.0000000149011612 --> 1e-25. (the last 25th bit are 1).
0.0000000298023224 --> 1e-24. (the last 24 bit is 1).
.....

As talked before, single precision float has the limited precision, may create some difference due to the rounding error. For complex computation, such error also may be accumulated. The following article has some similar discussion:
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/getting-reproducible-results-with-intel-mkl/

If high precision is important, double float point may be better choice for such computation.

Thanks,
Chao

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions [SOLVED/BUG]

SergeyKostrov — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:47:50 GMT

Quoting mpfeuti

...
the result according to MATLAB should be:

*******************************************
0 0 0 -0.2132 0.4264 -0.2132 0
0 0 0 -0.3162 0.6325 -0.3162 0
0 0 0 -0.4082 0.8165 -0.4082 0
0 0 0 -0.5000 1.0000 -0.5000 0
0 0 0 -0.4082 0.8165 -0.4082 0
0 0 0 -0.3162 0.6325 -0.3162 0
0 0 0 -0.2132 0.4264 -0.2132 0
*******************************************
...

Regarding MATLAB results:

1. It is not clearif a single-precision or a double-precision data typewas used;

2. The results are rounded to 4 digits after the point and it would be nice to see results withat least 16 digits after the point.

Best regards,
Sergey

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

harihar_n — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:13:31 GMT

Can this cause the problem reported in Post #7 - i.e. correlation values greater than 1 ?

Thanks,
Hari

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

SergeyKostrov — Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:06:57 GMT

Quoting harihar_n

Can this cause the problem reported in Post #7 - i.e. correlation values greater than 1?

It is not clear. You've submittedtwo bmp-files ( in Post #7 )but you have not submitted a simpleC/C++ Test-Case to reproduce your problem.

Best regards,
Sergey

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

igorastakhov — Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:13:25 GMT

Sergey,

take a look at the CrossCorr formula in the manual - it's too complex. EPS_32f is a weight of the LSB (the last significant bit in mantissa) - so it isan accuracy of each floating point operation - imaging one fp multiplication - each floating pointnumber has 24-bit mantissa - so intermediate result has 48-bit that should be rounded back to 24-bit... Therefore there is no any "strange" relation - it's just a rough representation of a number of fp operations per one output pixel. Also take into account that for rather large images "frame" algorithm based on FFT is used ("frame" means that order of FFT depends on template size, not image).

Regards,
Igor

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

igorastakhov — Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:21:47 GMT

There is no such issue for IPP 7.0.5 and higher.

Regards,
Igor

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

igorastakhov — Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:26:08 GMT

Hello H,

I've tested your image/template with IPP 7.0.5(6) - I don't see any correlation values greater than 1.0:

Intel Integrated Performance Primitives

CrossCorr test:

Library IppIP

CPU : p8

Name : ippip8_l.lib

Version : 7.0 build 205.85

Build date: Nov 25 2011

Image info: 59 x 59, number of channels = 1

-0.01 0.06 0.05 0.02 -0.01 -0.00 0.02 0.01 -0.02 -0.06 -0.04 0.02 0.01 -0.08 -0.09 -0.06 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.03 -0.02 -0.02 -0.01 -0.03 -0.07 -0.08 -0.04 0.04 0.08 0.04 -0.01 0.00 0.04 0.07 0.07

0.00 -0.01 -0.01 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.03 -0.01 -0.05 -0.05 0.04 0.03 -0.04 -0.07 -0.06 -0.01 -0.01 0.01 0.02 -0.00 0.01 0.00 -0.03 -0.07 -0.09 -0.04 0.04 -0.02 -0.03 -0.04 -0.01 0.02 0.04 0.03

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.01 -0.05 -0.06 -0.03 0.02 0.02 -0.04 -0.06 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.00 0.05 0.02 -0.03 -0.07 -0.06 -0.02 0.04 -0.02 -0.06 -0.05 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.03

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.00 -0.07 -0.08 -0.02 0.05 0.03 -0.02 -0.04 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 -0.03 -0.04 -0.05 -0.06 -0.07 -0.07 -0.06 -0.01 0.02 0.01 -0.05 -0.04 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.03

0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.02 -0.04 -0.07 -0.03 0.03 0.02 -0.01 -0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 -0.00 0.00 -0.04 -0.08 -0.08 -0.07 -0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 -0.05 -0.04

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.07 0.03 -0.03 -0.06 -0.05 -0.04 -0.03 -0.03 -0.00 0.03 0.00 -0.03 -0.01 0.06 0.10 0.03 -0.06 -0.10 -0.08 -0.05 0.00 -0.02 -0.05 -0.01 0.04 0.03 -0.02 -0.10 -0.09

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.02 -0.02 -0.06 -0.05 -0.05 -0.06 -0.07 -0.03 0.00 0.01 -0.03 -0.05 0.02 0.06 0.03 -0.04 -0.09 -0.07 -0.04 -0.02 -0.04 -0.04 -0.01 0.04 0.03 -0.00 -0.05 -0.04

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.04 -0.01 -0.05 -0.06 -0.01 -0.03 -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.02 0.04 0.03 -0.03 -0.07 -0.06 -0.04 -0.03 -0.04 -0.04 -0.01 0.02 0.01 -0.00 -0.00 0.02

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.00 -0.02 -0.04 -0.03 -0.05 -0.08 -0.07 -0.05 -0.05 -0.06 -0.05 -0.02 0.03 0.02 -0.02 -0.04 -0.03 -0.05 -0.06 -0.06 -0.06 -0.00 0.02 -0.01 -0.03 -0.03 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.01 -0.04 -0.05 -0.03 -0.02 -0.03 -0.06 -0.04 0.02 -0.01 -0.08 -0.08 -0.06 -0.01 0.02 0.03 0.08 0.06 0.00 -0.03 -0.03 -0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 -0.04 -0.05 -0.01

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.08 0.06 -0.01 -0.05 -0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 -0.08 -0.09 -0.07 -0.07 -0.06 -0.02 0.08 0.10 0.04 0.00 -0.02 -0.02 -0.04 -0.04 -0.05 -0.07 -0.06 -0.01

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.03 -0.04 -0.02 0.04 0.05 0.01 -0.01 0.03 0.06 0.06 -0.02 -0.05 -0.03 -0.05 -0.08 -0.06 -0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 -0.01 -0.03 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.05 -0.02 0.02

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.15 0.03 0.00 0.01 -0.02 -0.04 -0.04 -0.00 0.03 0.02 -0.02 -0.04 -0.01 -0.03 -0.07 -0.06 -0.05 -0.05 0.02 0.03 -0.02 -0.04 -0.02 -0.02 -0.04 -0.04 -0.03 -0.01

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.08 0.04 -0.00 -0.04 -0.09 -0.07 -0.03 0.03 0.04 0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.02 -0.07 -0.04 -0.02 -0.05 0.02 0.06 0.02 -0.04 -0.04 -0.01 -0.01 -0.02 -0.02 -0.01

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 -0.01 0.05 0.11 0.12 0.07 -0.00 -0.07 -0.07 -0.03 -0.00 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.03 -0.04 -0.06 -0.04 -0.01 0.03 0.07 0.10 0.03 -0.05 -0.09 -0.08 -0.06 -0.03 -0.01 -0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.07 0.12 0.13 0.06 -0.02 -0.03 -0.01 -0.03 -0.04 -0.02 0.02 0.04 0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.04 -0.00 0.05 0.06 0.01 -0.05 -0.08 -0.07 -0.05 -0.02 -0.03 -0.03

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.04 -0.01 -0.02 -0.02 -0.05 -0.07 -0.03 -0.01 -0.01 0.00 0.06 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.01 -0.02 -0.06 -0.08

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.02 -0.04 -0.06 -0.05 -0.06 -0.06 -0.03 -0.03 -0.05 -0.05 -0.03 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.03 -0.04 -0.06 -0.07

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.00 -0.03 -0.04 -0.05 -0.06 -0.01 0.01 -0.03 -0.05 -0.04 -0.00 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.02 -0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 -0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.03 0.06 0.07 0.05 0.03 -0.02 -0.05 -0.06 -0.02 -0.00 -0.04 -0.05 -0.01 -0.01 -0.03 -0.05 -0.03 -0.01 -0.03 -0.05 0.00 0.01 -0.01 -0.01 0.01

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.02 -0.01 -0.05 -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -0.05 -0.05 -0.01 -0.01 -0.04 -0.05 -0.06 -0.08 -0.07 -0.03 0.05 0.05 -0.00 -0.02 0.02

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.03 0.03 -0.02 -0.04 -0.03 0.00 -0.02 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.03 -0.03 -0.04 -0.05 -0.10 -0.12 -0.10 -0.02 -0.01 -0.04 -0.03 0.02

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.11 0.08 0.05 0.04 -0.02 -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 0.00 -0.02 -0.04 -0.01 -0.01 -0.05 -0.09 -0.12 -0.09 -0.02 -0.01 0.03 0.09 0.15

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.14 0.10 0.07 0.04 -0.01 -0.07 -0.09 -0.07 -0.06 -0.02 0.02 0.04 -0.02 -0.03 -0.02 -0.05 -0.09 -0.11 -0.10 -0.02 -0.01 0.01 0.04 0.09

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.06 -0.00 -0.06 -0.07 -0.08 -0.05 -0.02 -0.00 -0.01 -0.02 0.03 0.02 -0.04 -0.09 -0.08 -0.05 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0.02

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.02 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.03 -0.01 -0.03 -0.03 -0.01 -0.02 0.01 0.04 0.07 0.03 -0.03 -0.06 -0.07 -0.08 -0.11 -0.12 -0.09

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.03 -0.00 -0.02 -0.02 -0.05 -0.03 -0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 -0.02 -0.04 -0.07 -0.09 -0.11 -0.11

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.06 0.04 -0.01 -0.06 -0.04 -0.01 0.02 0.00 -0.01 -0.02 -0.04 -0.07 -0.06 -0.05 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.02 -0.02 -0.05 -0.09 -0.11

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.07 0.05 -0.02 -0.06 -0.07 -0.03 0.02 0.02 -0.02 -0.04 -0.01 -0.04 -0.05 -0.03 -0.02 -0.02 -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -0.02 -0.04 -0.07

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.14 0.11 -0.01 -0.07 -0.06 -0.04 0.02 0.05 0.03 -0.02 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 0.00 0.01 -0.02 -0.04 -0.06 -0.08 -0.08 -0.06 -0.06

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.06 -0.01 -0.04 -0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01 -0.00 -0.00 -0.03 -0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 -0.01 -0.03 -0.04 -0.05 -0.07 -0.05

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.09 0.10 0.07 0.01 -0.02 -0.03 -0.02 0.03 0.02 -0.03 -0.01 -0.01 -0.04 0.00 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.00 -0.03 -0.06 -0.09 -0.09

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.09 0.09 0.05 -0.01 -0.06 -0.05 -0.02 -0.00 -0.01 0.00 -0.00 -0.01 0.02 0.06 0.04 0.02 -0.00 -0.02 -0.06 -0.09 -0.06

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.06 0.06 -0.00 -0.05 -0.04 -0.02 -0.01 0.01 -0.02 -0.01 -0.01 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.01 -0.00 -0.02 -0.04 -0.03

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.01 -0.02 -0.05 -0.06 -0.04 -0.03 -0.04 -0.05 -0.06 -0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.01

Regards,
Igor

Wrong Cross Correlation Results in 0 regions

harihar_n — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:18:00 GMT

Thank you Igor! I checked with version 7.0.5 and the issue seems to have been fixed in it.

Regards,
Hari