<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Resize without interpolation in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resize-without-interpolation/m-p/864072#M8115</link>
    <description>Hi! Is there any way to implement resizing of image without any interpolation, or in other words with zero-padding interpolation. I'l try to explain. If we have original image I1(x,y) then the resulting image would be I2(Sx*x,Sy*y)=I1(x,y) and zero for other pixels of resulting image, and Sx,Sy are scale coefficients, something like that. Or maby there is way to add one more interpolation option to IppiResize function?. I need it to implement Undecimated Wavelet Transform.Thanks.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 11:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cultzero</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-09T11:55:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Resize without interpolation</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resize-without-interpolation/m-p/864072#M8115</link>
      <description>Hi! Is there any way to implement resizing of image without any interpolation, or in other words with zero-padding interpolation. I'l try to explain. If we have original image I1(x,y) then the resulting image would be I2(Sx*x,Sy*y)=I1(x,y) and zero for other pixels of resulting image, and Sx,Sy are scale coefficients, something like that. Or maby there is way to add one more interpolation option to IppiResize function?. I need it to implement Undecimated Wavelet Transform.Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 11:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resize-without-interpolation/m-p/864072#M8115</guid>
      <dc:creator>cultzero</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-09T11:55:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Resize without interpolation</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resize-without-interpolation/m-p/864073#M8116</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;you can use ippsSampleUp and ippsSampleDown functions for image rows. Vertical resampling can be done through n-row periodical decimation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Note, there is wavelet functions in IPP, please see manual for more details.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 18:06:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resize-without-interpolation/m-p/864073#M8116</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-14T18:06:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Resize without interpolation</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resize-without-interpolation/m-p/864074#M8117</link>
      <description>Hello now I understood how to do it. I didn't thought that I can use IPPs functions for image, but now I understand that I can. Thanks a lot. About note: I'm using wavelet functions in Ippi domain, but I need to sample up result of ippiWTFwd_32f_C1R since I'm implementing undecimated wavelet transform. Thanks again.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 11:36:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Resize-without-interpolation/m-p/864074#M8117</guid>
      <dc:creator>cultzero</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-17T11:36:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

