<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ippiCrossCorrValid_NormLevel_8u32f performance issue in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiCrossCorrValid-NormLevel-8u32f-performance-issue/m-p/869437#M8738</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;While evaluating Ipp6.1 version (x86, 32bit) I have  noticed that the &lt;BR /&gt;ippiCrossCorrValid_NormLevel_8u32f performs significantly slower (2-3 times) than&lt;BR /&gt;ippiCrossCorrValid_Norm_8u32f function on identical input.&lt;BR /&gt;Furthermore, it does perform slower than the ippiCrossCorrValid_NormLevel_8u32f from version IPP5.1.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The behaviour was identical on both Intel Core2Duo and Intel Atom processors.&lt;BR /&gt;The difference in performance is somewhat dependent on the actual size parameters for source and template.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any information on this topic would be wellcome.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:53:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cio7</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-04T10:53:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ippiCrossCorrValid_NormLevel_8u32f performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiCrossCorrValid-NormLevel-8u32f-performance-issue/m-p/869437#M8738</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;While evaluating Ipp6.1 version (x86, 32bit) I have  noticed that the &lt;BR /&gt;ippiCrossCorrValid_NormLevel_8u32f performs significantly slower (2-3 times) than&lt;BR /&gt;ippiCrossCorrValid_Norm_8u32f function on identical input.&lt;BR /&gt;Furthermore, it does perform slower than the ippiCrossCorrValid_NormLevel_8u32f from version IPP5.1.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The behaviour was identical on both Intel Core2Duo and Intel Atom processors.&lt;BR /&gt;The difference in performance is somewhat dependent on the actual size parameters for source and template.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any information on this topic would be wellcome.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:53:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiCrossCorrValid-NormLevel-8u32f-performance-issue/m-p/869437#M8738</guid>
      <dc:creator>cio7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-04T10:53:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ippiCrossCorrValid_NormLevel_8u32f performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiCrossCorrValid-NormLevel-8u32f-performance-issue/m-p/869438#M8739</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I suspect this has to do with differences in the nature of the calculation. The two are described below, note that the significant difference is the "cross-correlation value" that is calculated. The formulae are nearly identical, but one involves substantially more calculations than the other.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Go to this page:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/hpc/ipp/ippi/ippi_ch11/ch11_image_proximity_measures.html#ch11_image_proximity_measures"&gt;http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/hpc/ipp/ippi/ippi_ch11/ch11_image_proximity_measures.html#ch11_image_proximity_measures&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;in the documentation to see a detailed description of the two different correlation values:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SUB&gt;tx&lt;/SUB&gt;(r,c) and&lt;SUB&gt;tx&lt;/SUB&gt;(r,c)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Description&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;P&gt;The function ippiCrossCorrValid_Norm is declared in the ippi.h file. It operates with ROI (see &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/hpc/ipp/ippi/ippi_ch2/ch2_regions_of_interest_in_intel_ipp.html#ch2_regions_of_interest_in_intel_ipp"&gt;Regions of Interest in Intel IPP&lt;/A&gt;). This function computes the normalized cross-correlation values &lt;SUB&gt;tx&lt;/SUB&gt;(r,c) for the pixels of the source image without zero-padded edges. The size of the resulting matrix with normalized cross-correlation values is &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(W&lt;SUB&gt;s&lt;/SUB&gt; - W&lt;SUB&gt;t&lt;/SUB&gt; + 1) * (H&lt;SUB&gt;s&lt;/SUB&gt; - H&lt;SUB&gt;t&lt;/SUB&gt; + 1), &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;where W&lt;SUB&gt;s&lt;/SUB&gt; , H&lt;SUB&gt;s&lt;/SUB&gt; denote the width and height of the source image, and W&lt;SUB&gt;t&lt;/SUB&gt; , H&lt;SUB&gt;t&lt;/SUB&gt; denote the width and height of the template. The template anchor for matching the image pixel is always at the geometric center of the template. (See the formula for &lt;SUB&gt;tx&lt;/SUB&gt;(r,c) in section &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/hpc/ipp/ippi/ippi_ch11/ch11_image_proximity_measures.html#ch11_image_proximity_measures"&gt;Image Proximity Measures&lt;/A&gt;).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Description&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;P&gt;The function ippiCrossCorrValid_NormLevel is declared in the ippi.h file. It operates with ROI (see &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/hpc/ipp/ippi/ippi_ch2/ch2_regions_of_interest_in_intel_ipp.html#ch2_regions_of_interest_in_intel_ipp"&gt;Regions of Interest in Intel IPP&lt;/A&gt;). This function computes the normalized correlation coefficients &lt;SUB&gt;tx&lt;/SUB&gt;(r,c) for the pixels of the source image without zero-padded edges. The size of the resulting matrix with normalized correlation coefficients is &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(W&lt;SUB&gt;s&lt;/SUB&gt; - W&lt;SUB&gt;t&lt;/SUB&gt; + 1) * (H&lt;SUB&gt;s&lt;/SUB&gt; - H&lt;SUB&gt;t&lt;/SUB&gt; + 1), &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;where W&lt;SUB&gt;s&lt;/SUB&gt; , H&lt;SUB&gt;s&lt;/SUB&gt; denote the width and height of the source image, and W&lt;SUB&gt;t&lt;/SUB&gt; , H&lt;SUB&gt;t&lt;/SUB&gt; denote the width and height of the template. The template anchor for matching the image pixel is always at the geometric center of the template. (See the formula for &lt;SUB&gt;tx&lt;/SUB&gt;(r,c) in section &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/hpc/ipp/ippi/ippi_ch11/ch11_image_proximity_measures.html#ch11_image_proximity_measures"&gt;Image Proximity Measures&lt;/A&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 00:02:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippiCrossCorrValid-NormLevel-8u32f-performance-issue/m-p/869438#M8739</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaulF_IntelCorp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-18T00:02:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

