<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>tema UMC Build options en Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-Build-options/m-p/871577#M8993</link>
    <description>Hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've started started working with the audo-video-codec in the ipp-samples. I want to generate both ia32 and em64t versions of the libraries under WinXP using Intel C++ Pro 11 which includes IPP 6.0 Update 1. I have this much working with the included batch and make files (even after.svn directories have been introduced - that was interesting). What I would like to know is if it's safe to specify /MT instead of /MD and if I can use the UNICODE preprocessor definition so that the wchar_t is used by default. Does anyone have experience with the UMC libs building with /MT and UNICODE?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Peter&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:21:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pvonkaenel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-26T18:21:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>UMC Build options</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-Build-options/m-p/871577#M8993</link>
      <description>Hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've started started working with the audo-video-codec in the ipp-samples. I want to generate both ia32 and em64t versions of the libraries under WinXP using Intel C++ Pro 11 which includes IPP 6.0 Update 1. I have this much working with the included batch and make files (even after.svn directories have been introduced - that was interesting). What I would like to know is if it's safe to specify /MT instead of /MD and if I can use the UNICODE preprocessor definition so that the wchar_t is used by default. Does anyone have experience with the UMC libs building with /MT and UNICODE?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Peter&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:21:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-Build-options/m-p/871577#M8993</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvonkaenel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-26T18:21:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UMC Build options</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-Build-options/m-p/871578#M8994</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
Hi Peter,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;it should be safe to build UMC libraries with UNICODE support and we actually do this for internal build. To be honest I'm surprised that it is not a case in released package. The reason might be that UMC applications were not designed for that purpose (but it should be easy to modify on your side).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I also do not expect troubles with using static multithreaded runtime for UMC libraries (you need just ensure that application you will link with also use that version of C run-time libs).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:34:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-Build-options/m-p/871578#M8994</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-26T18:34:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UMC Build options</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-Build-options/m-p/871579#M8995</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="margin-top: 5px; width: 100%;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/336498"&gt;Vladimir Dudnik (Intel)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Hi Peter,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;it should be safe to build UMC libraries with UNICODE support and we actually do this for internal build. To be honest I'm surprised that it is not a case in released package. The reason might be that UMC applications were not designed for that purpose (but it should be easy to modify on your side).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I also do not expect troubles with using static multithreaded runtime for UMC libraries (you need just ensure that application you will link with also use that version of C run-time libs).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks Vladimir. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Peter&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:37:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/UMC-Build-options/m-p/871579#M8995</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvonkaenel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-26T19:37:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

