<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Super Sampling with square pixels? in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Super-Sampling-with-square-pixels/m-p/874023#M9291</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am revisiting an old project written with ippi 4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to reduce large images using SuperSample. I also want to keep the scaling in both directions identical. I think I want to use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ResizeSqrPixel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the docs there is an interpolation mode called,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IPPI_INTER_CUBIC2P_SUPER&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but this is missing from the header files. Is this an oversight? what is the correct value of IPPI_INTER_CUBIC2P_SUPER. Is this mode to be supported in ResizeSqrPixel into the future?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cannot use SuperSampling as a substitute as it is roi based instead of scale value based. The effect of pixel rounding in this way would cause artefacts given the way I am using the images.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Paul&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>paullumidium_com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-09T10:41:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Super Sampling with square pixels?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Super-Sampling-with-square-pixels/m-p/874023#M9291</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am revisiting an old project written with ippi 4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to reduce large images using SuperSample. I also want to keep the scaling in both directions identical. I think I want to use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ResizeSqrPixel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the docs there is an interpolation mode called,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IPPI_INTER_CUBIC2P_SUPER&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but this is missing from the header files. Is this an oversight? what is the correct value of IPPI_INTER_CUBIC2P_SUPER. Is this mode to be supported in ResizeSqrPixel into the future?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cannot use SuperSampling as a substitute as it is roi based instead of scale value based. The effect of pixel rounding in this way would cause artefacts given the way I am using the images.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Paul&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Super-Sampling-with-square-pixels/m-p/874023#M9291</guid>
      <dc:creator>paullumidium_com</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-09T10:41:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Super Sampling with square pixels?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Super-Sampling-with-square-pixels/m-p/874024#M9292</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By mistake we have added this mode (IPPI_INTER_CUBIC2P_SUPER - supersampling interpolation) into the Manual, corrected in the upcoming release of IPP. It means we have removed it from the ippiman.pdf.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Naveen Gv&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:20:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Super-Sampling-with-square-pixels/m-p/874024#M9292</guid>
      <dc:creator>Naveen_G_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-10T12:20:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Super Sampling with square pixels?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Super-Sampling-with-square-pixels/m-p/874025#M9293</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Naveen,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does this mean that you have removed the capacity to resize images using Super Sampling with identical scaling in the x and y directions? This is possible with the depricated Resize but not with the new SuperSample function.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To remove this feature would be a reduction in the capabilities of the library. If you are doing this please rethink as my use of ippi depends on it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Paul&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Super-Sampling-with-square-pixels/m-p/874025#M9293</guid>
      <dc:creator>paullumidium_com</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-10T18:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Super Sampling with square pixels?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Super-Sampling-with-square-pixels/m-p/874026#M9294</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Paul,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, there is Super Sampling method for the functions ippiResize, ippiResizeSqrPixel and ippiSuperSampling&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IPPI_INTER_CUBIC2P_SUPER was an erratum&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Naveen Gv&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Super-Sampling-with-square-pixels/m-p/874026#M9294</guid>
      <dc:creator>Naveen_G_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-21T11:04:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

