<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IPP 6.0 Atom 64-bit n8 static libraries in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-Atom-64-bit-n8-static-libraries/m-p/874062#M9299</link>
    <description>It would be great to have Atom treated the same way other processors libraries are implemented: 64-bit goes into em64t package, 32-bit - ia32, both shared and static libraries.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Arkadi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-01-11T09:17:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPP 6.0 Atom 64-bit n8 static libraries</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-Atom-64-bit-n8-static-libraries/m-p/874060#M9297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;BR /&gt;IPP has tools/staticlib/ directory with header files and merged static libraries to statically link specific core into application. In IPP 6.0.1 lp32 there is s8 core for Atom CPU rinning 32-bit mode. The question is: where n8 64-bit static core could be found?&lt;BR /&gt;ia32 IPP has shared s8 core, but no header file and no s8_* functions in static libraries. em64t IPP has shared n8 core, but also no header file and no n8_* functions in static libraries. Is it somehow inconsistent?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:22:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-Atom-64-bit-n8-static-libraries/m-p/874060#M9297</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arkadi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T12:22:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP 6.0 Atom 64-bit n8 static libraries</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-Atom-64-bit-n8-static-libraries/m-p/874061#M9298</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
Yes, there are some inconsistency on the packages we delivered in 6.0 and MID toolkit. We may consider to complete the gap in next releases.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Do you need static libraries for Atom, or can shared libraires work for your case?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Ying</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:31:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-Atom-64-bit-n8-static-libraries/m-p/874061#M9298</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ying_S_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-08T20:31:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP 6.0 Atom 64-bit n8 static libraries</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-Atom-64-bit-n8-static-libraries/m-p/874062#M9299</link>
      <description>It would be great to have Atom treated the same way other processors libraries are implemented: 64-bit goes into em64t package, 32-bit - ia32, both shared and static libraries.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-Atom-64-bit-n8-static-libraries/m-p/874062#M9299</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arkadi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-11T09:17:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP 6.0 Atom 64-bit n8 static libraries</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-Atom-64-bit-n8-static-libraries/m-p/874063#M9300</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="margin-top: 5px; width: 100%;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/336671"&gt;YING S (Intel)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Do you need static libraries for Atom, or can shared libraires work for your case?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;By your comment and the lack of s8_/n8_ staticlib/*.h windows 32-bit files I take it there is no atom staticlib support. Orhave I missed the Install Atom support checkbox during the install?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:24:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-Atom-64-bit-n8-static-libraries/m-p/874063#M9300</guid>
      <dc:creator>ME</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-17T23:24:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP 6.0 Atom 64-bit n8 static libraries</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-Atom-64-bit-n8-static-libraries/m-p/874064#M9301</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="width: 100%; margin-top: 5px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/336671"&gt;Ying S (Intel)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Do you need static libraries for Atom, or can shared libraires work for your case?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
Is there an update on the issue? IPP 6.1 Update 1 for Linux still has this inconsistency.&lt;BR /&gt;Static libraries would be much better for my case.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-Atom-64-bit-n8-static-libraries/m-p/874064#M9301</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arkadi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-24T23:44:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

