https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Cryptography-Tate-Pairing/m-p/876533#M9609 Hello<BR /><BR />When I'm trying to initialize Tate pairing context with<BR /><BR />ippsTatePairingDE3Init(Pairing,EC,GFPXEC,GFPXQ);<BR /><BR />I'm obtaining: "Function arg/param is bad"<BR /><BR /><BR />1) The memory for Pairing is allocated as follows:<BR />Ipp32u Tatesize;<BR />ippsTatePairingDE3GetSize(pEC,pGFPXEC,&amp;Tatesize);<BR />IppsTatePairingDE3State* Pairing=(IppsTatePairingDE3State*)(new Ipp8u [Tatesize]);<BR /><BR />2) EC,GFPXEC conexts passed validation procedure<BR /><BR />3) Initialization of GFPXQ returns: No error, it's OK<BR /><BR />Can anybody tell me the possible reasons<BR /><BR />How the irreducible polynomials for GF(p^d) and GF(p^d^2) should be related?<BR />Any example?<BR /><BR />The manual is much to laconic (the unique reference [EHCC] is purely theorethical)<BR /><BR />A Chrzeszczyk Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:40:02 GMT achrzesz2 2010-03-05T11:40:02Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Cryptography-Tate-Pairing/m-p/876533#M9609 Hello<BR /><BR />When I'm trying to initialize Tate pairing context with<BR /><BR />ippsTatePairingDE3Init(Pairing,EC,GFPXEC,GFPXQ);<BR /><BR />I'm obtaining: "Function arg/param is bad"<BR /><BR /><BR />1) The memory for Pairing is allocated as follows:<BR />Ipp32u Tatesize;<BR />ippsTatePairingDE3GetSize(pEC,pGFPXEC,&amp;Tatesize);<BR />IppsTatePairingDE3State* Pairing=(IppsTatePairingDE3State*)(new Ipp8u [Tatesize]);<BR /><BR />2) EC,GFPXEC conexts passed validation procedure<BR /><BR />3) Initialization of GFPXQ returns: No error, it's OK<BR /><BR />Can anybody tell me the possible reasons<BR /><BR />How the irreducible polynomials for GF(p^d) and GF(p^d^2) should be related?<BR />Any example?<BR /><BR />The manual is much to laconic (the unique reference [EHCC] is purely theorethical)<BR /><BR />A Chrzeszczyk Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:40:02 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Cryptography-Tate-Pairing/m-p/876533#M9609 achrzesz2 2010-03-05T11:40:02Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Cryptography-Tate-Pairing/m-p/876534#M9610 <P>Were you able to make any progress with your application?</P> Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:43:03 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Cryptography-Tate-Pairing/m-p/876534#M9610 PaulF_IntelCorp 2010-09-10T16:43:03Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Cryptography-Tate-Pairing/m-p/876535#M9611 No I'm still waiting for any example<BR />I can imagine that may arg/param were bad<BR />but with the present form of documentation I cant improve them<BR /><BR />A Ch Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:33:00 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Cryptography-Tate-Pairing/m-p/876535#M9611 achrzesz2 2010-09-10T19:33:00Z